Overuse of Chest CT in Patients With Stage I and II Breast Cancer: An Opportunity to Increase Guidelines Compliance at an NCCN Member Institution

Authors:
Barbara Dull From the Division of General Surgery, Section of Endocrine and Oncologic Surgery, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri.

Search for other papers by Barbara Dull in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
,
Andrew Linkugel From the Division of General Surgery, Section of Endocrine and Oncologic Surgery, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri.

Search for other papers by Andrew Linkugel in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 BA
,
Julie A. Margenthaler From the Division of General Surgery, Section of Endocrine and Oncologic Surgery, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri.

Search for other papers by Julie A. Margenthaler in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
, and
Amy E. Cyr From the Division of General Surgery, Section of Endocrine and Oncologic Surgery, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri.

Search for other papers by Amy E. Cyr in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
Restricted access

Background: The NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) recommend that patients with clinical stage I/II breast cancer undergo advanced imaging for staging only when symptomatic. Regardless, many asymptomatic patients undergo chest CT. The goal of this study was to assess the use and results of chest CT in these patients at an NCCN Member Institution. Methods: Patients with breast cancer diagnosed between 1998 and 2012 were identified in a prospectively maintained database. All patients with clinical stage I/II disease who did not receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy were included. Data collected included demographics, tumor size, node status, chest CT within 6 months of diagnosis, imaging findings, need for additional workup, and identification of metastatic disease. Appropriate statistical tests were used for analysis. Results: From 1998 to 2012, 3,321 patients were diagnosed with early-stage breast cancer. Of these, 2,062 (62.1%) had clinical stage I breast cancer at diagnosis and 1,259 (37.9%) had stage II; 227 patients (11%) with stage I and 456 (36.2%) with stage II breast cancer received staging chest CT. Of patients undergoing CT, 184 (26.9%) were found to have pulmonary nodules, which measured ≤5 mm for 128 patients (69.6%), 5 to 10 mm for 46 patients (25.0%), 11 to 20 mm for 6 patients (3.2%), and ≥20 mm for 4 patients (2.2%). Patients undergoing chest CT for staging subsequently underwent a mean of 2.34 (range, 0–16) additional CTs in follow-up. Of all patients undergoing chest CT for staging, only 9 (1.3%) were ultimately diagnosed with pulmonary metastases at an average of 25 months (range, 0–97) after initial staging chest CT. Conclusions: A significant percentage of patients with stage I/II breast cancer underwent unnecessary chest CT as part of their initial workup. Nearly one-third of these patients were found to have pulmonary nodules, but only 1.3% were ever diagnosed with pulmonary metastases. Adherence to NCCN Guidelines will reduce the excessive use of CT chest imaging.

Author contributions: Study design: Margenthaler, Cyr. Data acquisition: Dull, Linkugel. Data analysis: Dull, Cyr. Drafting of manuscript: Margenthaler, Dull, Cyr.

Correspondence: Amy E. Cyr, MD, Washington University School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, CB 8109, 660 South Euclid Avenue, St. Louis, MO 63110. E-mail: cyra@wudosis.wustl.edu
  • Collapse
  • Expand
  • 1.

    Cancer Stat Facts: Female Breast Cancer. National Cancer Institute Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program Web site. Available at: http://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/breast.html. Accessed September 10, 2016.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2.

    AJCC. Breast Cancer Staging. Available at: https://cancerstaging.org/references-tools/quickreferences/Documents/BreastMedium.pdf. Accessed August 22, 2016.

  • 3.

    Gradishar WJ, Anderson BO, Balassanian R et al.. NCCN Clinical Practice Guideline in Oncology, Breast Cancer, Version 2.2016. Accessed January 13, 2017. To view the most recent version of these guidelines, visit NCCN.org.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4.

    Schnipper LE, Smith TJ, Raghavan D et al.. American Society of Clinical Oncology identifies five key opportunities to improve care and reduce costs: the top five list for oncology. J Clin Oncol 2012;30:17151724.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5.

    Senkus E, Kyriakides S, Ohno S et al.. Primary breast cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 2013;24(Suppl 6):vi723.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6.

    Breast cancer. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Web site. Available at: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/qs12. Accessed September 10, 2016.

  • 7.

    Puglisi F, Follador A, Minisini AM et al.. Baseline staging tests after a new diagnosis of breast cancer: further evidence of their limited indications. Ann Oncol 2005;16:263266.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8.

    Lee B, Lim A, Lalvani A et al.. The clinical significance of radiologically detected silent pulmonary nodules in early breast cancer. Ann Oncol 2008;19:20012006.

  • 9.

    Ravaioli A, Pasini G, Polselli A et al.. Staging of breast cancer: new recommended standard procedure. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2002;72:5360.

  • 10.

    Barrett T, Bowden DJ, Greenberg DC et al.. Radiological staging in breast cancer: which asymptomatic patients to image and how. Br J Cancer 2009;101:15221528.

  • 11.

    Brennan ME, Houssami N. Evaluation of the evidence on staging imaging for detection of asymptomatic distant metastases in newly diagnosed breast cancer. Breast 2012;21:112123.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12.

    Kim H, Han W, Moon HG et al.. The value of preoperative staging chest computed tomography to detect asymptomatic lung and liver metastasis in patients with primary breast carcinoma. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2011;126:637641.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13.

    Gerber B, Seitz E, Muller H et al.. Perioperative screening for metastatic disease is not indicated in patients with primary breast cancer and no clinical signs of tumor spread. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2003;82:2937.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14.

    Makarov DV, Soulos PR, Gold HT et al.. Regional-level correlations in inappropriate imaging rates for prostate and breast cancers: potential implications for the Choosing Wisely campaign. JAMA Oncol 2015;1:185194.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15.

    Crivello ML, Ruth K, Sigurdson ER et al.. Advanced imaging modalities in early stage breast cancer: preoperative use in the United States Medicare population. Ann Surg Oncol 2013;20:102110.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16.

    Kamal A, Zhang T, Power S, Marcom PK. Is advanced imaging in early-stage breast cancer ever warranted? Reconciling clinical judgment with common quality measures. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2016;14:993998.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17.

    Cermik TF, Mavi A, Basu S et al.. Impact of FDG PET on the preoperative staging of newly diagnosed breast cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2008;35:475483.

  • 18.

    Fuster D, Duch J, Paredes P et al.. Preoperative staging of large primary breast cancer with [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography compared with conventional imaging procedures. J Clin Oncol 2008;26:47464751.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19.

    Mehta VK, Goffinet DR. Unsuspected abnormalities noted on CT treatment-planning scans obtained for breast and chest wall irradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2001;49:723725.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20.

    Nakamura N, Tsunoda H, Takahashi O et al.. Frequency and clinical significance of previously undetected incidental findings detected on computed tomography simulation scans for breast cancer patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2012;84:602605.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21.

    Rao S, Patel A, Levin K et al.. How often are previously undetected radiographic abnormalities detected at the time of CT simulation for breast cancer patients? Am J Clin Oncol 2010;33:262264.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22.

    Kim MJ, Kim EK, Keum KC et al.. Treatment-planning CT scan for breast and chest-wall irradiation: how many unexpected abnormalities could we detect? Clin Imaging 2008;32:443446.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23.

    Linkugel A, Margenthaler J, Dull B et al.. Staging studies have limited utility for newly diagnosed stage I-II breast cancer. J Surg Res 2015;196:3338.

  • 24.

    Purushotham A, Shamil E, Cariati M et al.. Age at diagnosis and distant metastasis in breast cancer—a surprising inverse relationship. Eur J Cancer 2014;50:16971705.

  • 25.

    Hung MH, Liu CY, Shiau CY et al.. Effect of age and biological subtype on the risk and timing of brain metastasis in breast cancer patients. PLoS One 2014;9:e89389.

  • 26.

    Levon V, Alberini JL, Pierga JY et al.. The rate of distant metastases on FDG-PET/CT at initial staging of breast cancer: comparison between women younger and older than 40 years. J Nucl Med 2017;58:252257.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27.

    Reidl CC, Slobod E, Jochelson M et al.. Retrospective analysis of 18F-FDG PET/CT for staging asymptomatic breast cancer patients younger than 40 years. J Nucl Med 2014;55:15781583.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28.

    Gould MK, Tang T, Liu IA et al.. Recent trends in the identification of incidental pulmonary nodules. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2015;192:12081214.

  • 29.

    Rinaldi MF, Bartalena T, Giannelli G et al.. Incidental lung nodules on CT examinations of the abdomen: prevalence and reporting rates in the PACS era. Eur J Radiol 2010;74:e8488.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30.

    Gould MK, Fletcher J, Iannettoni MD et al.. Evaluation of patients with pulmonary nodules: when is it lung cancer?: ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (2nd edition). Chest 2007;132(3 Suppl):108S130S.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 31.

    MacMahon H, Austin JH, Gamsu G et al.. Guidelines for management of small pulmonary nodules detected on CT scans: a statement from the Fleischner Society. Radiology 2005;237:395400.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 32.

    Blagev DP, Lloyd JF, Conner K et al.. Follow-up of incidental pulmonary nodules and the radiology report. J Am Coll Radiol 2014;11:378383.

  • 33.

    Lacson R, Prevedello LM, Andriole KP et al.. Factors associated with radiologists' adherence to Fleischner Society guidelines for management of pulmonary nodules. J Am Coll Radiol 2012;9:468473.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 34.

    Wiener RS, Gould MK, Slatore CG et al.. Resource use and guideline concordance in evaluation of pulmonary nodules for cancer: too much and too little care. JAMA Intern Med 2014;174:871880.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 35.

    Simos D, Hutton B, Clemons M. Are physicians choosing wisely when imaging for distant metastases in women with operable breast cancer? J Oncol Pract 2015;11:6268.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 36.

    Simos D, Hutton B, Graham ID et al.. Imaging for metastatic disease in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer: are doctor's perceptions in keeping with the guidelines? J Eval Clin Pract 2015;21:6773.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 37.

    Cabana MD, Rand CS, Powe NR et al.. Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement. JAMA 1999;282:14581465.

  • 38.

    Simos D, Hutton B, Graham ID et al.. Patient perceptions and expectations regarding imaging for metastatic disease in early stage breast cancer. Springerplus 2014;3:176.

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 1971 369 11
PDF Downloads 846 181 9
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0