Optimizing Patient Care in Chronic Phase Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia: A Multidisciplinary Approach

Authors:
Hema Sundar From the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Fort Washington, Pennsylvania; and Molecular Oncology Laboratory at Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, and University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington.

Search for other papers by Hema Sundar in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PhD
and
Jerald Radich From the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Fort Washington, Pennsylvania; and Molecular Oncology Laboratory at Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, and University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington.

Search for other papers by Jerald Radich in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
Restricted access

Chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) is characterized by the presence of the Philadelphia chromosome arising from a reciprocal translocation between chromosomes 9 and 22 [t(9;22)]. This translocation results in the formation of the BCR-ABL fusion gene. The product of this fusion gene, p210, a protein with deregulated tyrosine kinase activity, plays a central role in the pathogenesis of CML. Tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy with small molecule inhibitors of BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase has significantly reduced the annual mortality rate among patients with CML. Although most of these patients respond to first-line TKI therapy, the use of TKIs is complicated by the development of resistance or intolerance in some patients, resulting in a loss of response or discontinuation of treatment. Inadequate response to TKI therapy is associated with poor long-term outcome, and the cases of patients with resistance or intolerance should be carefully evaluated for alternative treatment options. This report discusses the challenges associated with the management of newly diagnosed chronic phase CML in a patient with intolerance to multiple TKI therapies.

Correspondence: Hema Sundar, PhD, NCCN, 275 Commerce Drive, Suite 300, Fort Washington, PA. E-mail: sundar@nccn.org.
  • Collapse
  • Expand
  • 1.

    Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin 2015;65:529.

  • 2.

    Sawyers CL. Chronic myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med 1999;340:13301340.

  • 3.

    Druker BJ, Guilhot F, O'Brien SG et al.. Five-year follow-up of patients receiving imatinib for chronic myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med 2006;355:24082417.

  • 4.

    Deininger M, O'Brien SG, Guilhot F et al.. International randomized study of interferon vs STI571 (IRIS) 8-year follow up: sustained survival and low risk for progression or events in patients with newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP) treated with imatinib [abstract]. Blood 2009;114:Abstract 1126.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5.

    Cortes JE, Saglio G, Baccarani M et al.. Final Study Results of the Phase 3 Dasatinib Versus Imatinib in Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CML-CP) Trial (DASISION, CA180-056) [abstract]. Blood 2014;124:Abstract 152.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6.

    Larson RA, Kim D-W, Issaragrilsil S et al.. Efficacy and safety of nilotinib (NIL) vs imatinib (IM) in patients (pts) with newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP): long-term follow-up (f/u) of ENESTnd [abstract]. Blood 2014;124:Abstract 4541.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7.

    Kantarjian HM, Shah NP, Cortes JE et al.. Dasatinib or imatinib in newly diagnosed chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia: 2-year follow-up from a randomized phase 3 trial (DASISION). Blood 2012;119:11231129.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8.

    Larson RA, Hochhaus A, Hughes TP et al.. Nilotinib vs imatinib in patients with newly diagnosed Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase: ENESTnd 3-year follow-up. Leukemia 2012;26:21972203.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9.

    Hanfstein B, Muller MC, Hehlmann R et al.. Early molecular and cytogenetic response is predictive for long-term progression-free and overall survival in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Leukemia 2012;26:20962102.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10.

    Marin D, Ibrahim AR, Lucas C et al.. Assessment of BCR-ABL1 transcript levels at 3 months is the only requirement for predicting outcome for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors. J Clin Oncol 2012;30:232238.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11.

    Hughes TP, Saglio G, Kantarjian HM et al.. Early molecular response predicts outcomes in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase treated with frontline nilotinib or imatinib. Blood 2014;123:13531360.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12.

    Yeung DT, Osborn MP, White DL et al.. TIDEL-II: first-line use of imatinib in CML with early switch to nilotinib for failure to achieve time-dependent molecular targets. Blood 2015;125:915923.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13.

    Giles FJ, le Coutre PD, Pinilla-Ibarz J et al.. Nilotinib in imatinib-resistant or imatinib-intolerant patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase: 48-month follow-up results of a phase II study. Leukemia 2013;27:107112.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14.

    Shah NP, Guilhot F, Cortes JE et al.. Long-term outcome with dasatinib after imatinib failure in chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia: follow-up of a phase 3 study. Blood 2014;123:23172324.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15.

    Hughes T, Deininger M, Hochhaus A et al.. Monitoring CML patients responding to treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors: review and recommendations for harmonizing current methodology for detecting BCR-ABL transcripts and kinase domain mutations and for expressing results. Blood 2006;108:2837.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16.

    Eliasson L, Clifford S, Barber N, Marin D. Exploring chronic myeloid leukemia patients' reasons for not adhering to the oral anticancer drug imatinib as prescribed. Leuk Res 2011;35:626630.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17.

    Efficace F, Baccarani M, Breccia M et al.. Chronic fatigue is the most important factor limiting health-related quality of life of chronic myeloid leukemia patients treated with imatinib. Leukemia 2013;27:15111519.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18.

    Kantarjian HM, Giles FJ, Bhalla KN et al.. Nilotinib is effective in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase after imatinib resistance or intolerance: 24-month follow-up results. Blood 2011;117:11411145.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19.

    Porkka K, Khoury HJ, Paquette RL et al.. Dasatinib 100 mg once daily minimizes the occurrence of pleural effusion in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase and efficacy is unaffected in patients who develop pleural effusion. Cancer 2010;116:377386.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20.

    Gambacorti-Passerini C, Khoury HJ, Kantarjian HM et al.. Bosutinib as third-line therapy in patients (Pts) with chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CP CML) following failure with imatinib plus dasatinib and/or nilotinib: 48-month update of a phase 1/2 study [abstract]. Blood 2014;124:Abstract 4559.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21.

    Cortes JE, Kim D-W, Pinilla-Ibarz J et al.. Long-term follow-up of ponatinib efficacy and safety in the phase 2 PACE trial [abstract]. Blood 2014;124:Abstract 3135.

  • 22.

    Haouala A, Widmer N, Duchosal MA et al.. Drug interactions with the tyrosine kinase inhibitors imatinib, dasatinib, and nilotinib. Blood 2011;117:e7587.

  • 23.

    Noens L, van Lierde M-A, De Bock R et al.. Prevalence, determinants, and outcomes of nonadherence to imatinib therapy in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia: the ADAGIO study. Blood 2009;113:54015411.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24.

    Marin D, Bazeos A, Mahon F-X et al.. Adherence is the critical factor for achieving molecular responses in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia who achieve complete cytogenetic responses on imatinib. J Clin Oncol 2010;28:23812388.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25.

    Ibrahim AR, Eliasson L, Apperley JF et al.. Poor adherence is the main reason for loss of CCyR and imatinib failure for chronic myeloid leukemia patients on long-term therapy. Blood 2011;117:37333736.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26.

    Deangelo DJ. Managing chronic myeloid leukemia patients intolerant to tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy. Blood Cancer J 2012;2:e95.

  • 27.

    Quintas-Cardama A, Kantarjian H, Jones D et al.. Dasatinib (BMS-354825) is active in Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myelogenous leukemia after imatinib and nilotinib (AMN107) therapy failure. Blood 2007;109:497499.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28.

    Garg RJ, Kantarjian H, O'Brien S et al.. The use of nilotinib or dasatinib after failure to 2 prior tyrosine kinase inhibitors: long-term follow-up. Blood 2009;114:43614368.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 29.

    Cortes J, Digumarti R, Parikh PM et al.. Phase 2 study of subcutaneous omacetaxine mepesuccinate for chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia patients resistant to or intolerant of tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Am J Hematol 2013;88:350354.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30.

    Cortes JE, Nicolini FE, Wetzler M et al.. Subcutaneous omacetaxine mepesuccinate in patients with chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia previously treated with 2 or more tyrosine kinase inhibitors including imatinib. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk 2013;13:584591.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 31.

    Laudadio J, Deininger MW, Mauro MJ et al.. An intron-derived insertion/truncation mutation in the BCR-ABL kinase domain in chronic myeloid leukemia patients undergoing kinase inhibitor therapy. J Mol Diagn 2008;10:177180.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 32.

    O'Hare T, Zabriskie MS, Eide CA et al.. The BCR-ABL35INS insertion/truncation mutant is kinase-inactive and does not contribute to tyrosine kinase inhibitor resistance in chronic myeloid leukemia. Blood 2011;118:52505254.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 33.

    Soverini S, Hochhaus A, Nicolini FE et al.. BCR-ABL kinase domain mutation analysis in chronic myeloid leukemia patients treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors: recommendations from an expert panel on behalf of European LeukemiaNet. Blood 2011;118:12081215.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 34.

    Deininger MWN, Cortes JE, Kim D-W et al.. Impact of baseline mutations on response to ponatinib and end of treatment mutation analysis in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia [abstract]. J Clin Oncol 2013;31(15_suppl):Abstract 7001.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 35.

    Branford S, Rudzki Z, Parkinson I et al.. Real-time quantitative PCR analysis can be used as a primary screen to identify patients with CML treated with imatinib who have BCR-ABL kinase domain mutations. Blood 2004;104:29262932.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 36.

    Kantarjian HM, Shan J, Jones D et al.. Significance of increasing levels of minimal residual disease in patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myelogenous leukemia in complete cytogenetic response. J Clin Oncol 2009;27:36593663.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 917 377 3
PDF Downloads 186 27 1
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0