Readability of Online Patient Educational Resources Found on NCI-Designated Cancer Center Web Sites
Search for other papers by Stephen A. Rosenberg in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by David Francis in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Craig R. Hullett in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Zachary S. Morris in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Michael M. Fisher in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Jeffrey V. Brower in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
From The Department of Human Oncology and University of Wisconsin Carbone Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, Wisconsin.
Search for other papers by Kristin A. Bradley in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
From The Department of Human Oncology and University of Wisconsin Carbone Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, Wisconsin.
Search for other papers by Bethany M. Anderson in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
From The Department of Human Oncology and University of Wisconsin Carbone Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, Wisconsin.
Search for other papers by Michael F. Bassetti in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
From The Department of Human Oncology and University of Wisconsin Carbone Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, Wisconsin.
Search for other papers by Randall J. Kimple in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Background: The NIH and Department of Health & Human Services recommend online patient information (OPI) be written at a sixth grade level. We used a panel of readability analyses to assess OPI from NCI-Designated Cancer Center (NCIDCC) Web sites. Methods: Cancer.gov was used to identify 68 NCIDCC Web sites from which we collected both general OPI and OPI specific to breast, prostate, lung, and colon cancers. This text was analyzed by 10 commonly used readability tests: the New Dale-Chall Readability Formula, Flesch Reading Ease scale, Flesch-Kinaid Grade Level, FORCAST scale, Fry Readability Graph, Simple Measure of Gobbledygook test, Gunning Frequency of Gobbledygook index, New Fog Count, Raygor Readability Estimate Graph, and Coleman-Liau Index. We tested the hypothesis that the readability of NCIDCC OPI was written at the sixth grade level. Secondary analyses were performed to compare readability of OPI between comprehensive and noncomprehensive centers, by region, and to OPI produced by the American Cancer Society (ACS). Results: A mean of 30,507 words from 40 comprehensive and 18 noncomprehensive NCIDCCs was analyzed (7 nonclinical and 3 without appropriate OPI were excluded). Using a composite grade level score, the mean readability score of 12.46 (ie, college level: 95% CI, 12.13–12.79) was significantly greater than the target grade level of 6 (middle-school: P<.001). No difference between comprehensive and noncomprehensive centers was identified. Regional differences were identified in 4 of the 10 readability metrics (P<.05). ACS OPI provides easier language, at the seventh to ninth grade level, across all tests (P<.01). Conclusions: OPI from NCIDCC Web sites is more complex than recommended for the average patient.
Supplementary Materials
- Supplemental Material (PDF 160 KB)
© 2019-2024 National Comprehensive Cancer Network