Gastric cancer is the fifth most frequently diagnosed cancer and the third leading cause of death from cancer in the world. Several advances have been made in the staging procedures, imaging techniques, and treatment approaches. The NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for Gastric Cancer provide an evidence- and consensus-based treatment approach for the management of patients with gastric cancer. This manuscript discusses the recommendations outlined in the NCCN Guidelines for staging, assessment of HER2 overexpression, systemic therapy for locally advanced or metastatic disease, and best supportive care for the prevention and management of symptoms due to advanced disease.

  • 1.

    BlotWJDevesaSSKnellerRWFraumeniJF. Rising incidence of adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and gastric cardia. JAMA1991;265:12871289.

  • 2.

    JohnstonBJReedPI. Changing pattern of oesophageal cancer in a general hospital in the UK. Eur J Cancer Prev1991;1:2325.

  • 3.

    PowellJMcConkeyCC. Increasing incidence of adenocarcinoma of the gastric cardia and adjacent sites. Br J Cancer1990;62:440443.

  • 4.

    GLOBOCAN 2012: Stomach Cancer: Estimated Incidence Mortality and Prevalence Worldwide in 2012. Available at: http://globocan.iarc.fr/old/FactSheets/cancers/stomach-new.asp. Accessed November 4th 2014.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5.

    SiegelRLMillerKDJemalA. Cancer statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J Clin2016;66:730.

  • 6.

    CrewKDNeugutAI. Epidemiology of upper gastrointestinal malignancies. Semin Oncol2004;31:450464.

  • 7.

    KuboACorleyDA. Marked regional variation in adenocarcinomas of the esophagus and the gastric cardia in the United States. Cancer2002;95:20962102.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8.

    PowellJMcConkeyCCGillisonEWSpychalRT. Continuing rising trend in oesophageal adenocarcinoma. Int J Cancer2002;102:422427.

  • 9.

    CorleyDABufflerPA. Oesophageal and gastric cardia adenocarcinomas: analysis of regional variation using the Cancer Incidence in Five Continents database. Int J Epidemiol2001;30:14151425.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10.

    ParkinDMMuirCS. Cancer Incidence in Five Continents: comparability and quality of data. IARC Sci Publ1992:45173.

  • 11.

    TramacereINegriEPelucchiC. A meta-analysis on alcohol drinking and gastric cancer risk. Ann Oncol2012;23:2836.

  • 12.

    Japanese Research Society for Gastric cancer. The general rules for the gastric cancer study in surgery and pathology (ed 12): Tokyo: Kanahara Shuppan; 1993.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13.

    RoderJDBottcherKBuschR. Classification of regional lymph node metastasis from gastric carcinoma. German Gastric Cancer Study Group. Cancer1998;82:621631.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14.

    ChauINormanARCunninghamD. Multivariate prognostic factor analysis in locally advanced and metastatic esophago-gastric cancer—pooled analysis from three multicenter, randomized, controlled trials using individual patient data. J Clin Oncol2004;22:23952403.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15.

    KarpehMSLeonLKlimstraDBrennanMF. Lymph node staging in gastric cancer: is location more important than number? An analysis of 1,038 patients. Ann Surg2000;232:362371.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16.

    AbdallaEKPistersPWT. Staging and preoperative evaluation of upper gastrointestinal malignancies. Semin Oncol2004;31:513529.

  • 17.

    KweeRMKweeTC. Imaging in local staging of gastric cancer: a systematic review. J Clin Oncol2007;25:21072116.

  • 18.

    WeberWAOttK. Imaging of esophageal and gastric cancer. Semin Oncol2004;31:530541.

  • 19.

    MatsumotoYYanaiHTokiyamaH. Endoscopic ultrasonography for diagnosis of submucosal invasion in early gastric cancer. J Gastroenterol2000;35:326331.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20.

    CardosoRCoburnNSeevaratnamR. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the utility of EUS for preoperative staging for gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer2012;15(Suppl 1):S1926.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21.

    SpolveratoGEjazAKimY. Use of endoscopic ultrasound in the preoperative staging of gastric cancer: a multi-institutional study of the US gastric cancer collaborative. J Am Coll Surg2015;220:4856.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22.

    TsendsurenTJunS-MMianX-H. Usefulness of endoscopic ultrasonography in preoperative TNM staging of gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol2006;12:4347.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23.

    StahlAOttKWeberWA. FDG PET imaging of locally advanced gastric carcinomas: correlation with endoscopic and histopathological findings. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging2003;30:288295.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24.

    ChenJCheongJ-HYunMJ. Improvement in preoperative staging of gastric adenocarcinoma with positron emission tomography. Cancer2005;103:23832390.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25.

    RosenbaumSJStergarHAntochG. Staging and follow-up of gastrointestinal tumors with PET/CT. Abdom Imaging2006;31:2535.

  • 26.

    DassenAELipsDJHoekstraCJ. FDG-PET has no definite role in preoperative imaging in gastric cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol2009;35:449455.

  • 27.

    LimJSYunMJKimM-J. CT and PET in stomach cancer: preoperative staging and monitoring of response to therapy. Radiographics2006;26:143156.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28.

    SarelaAILefkowitzRBrennanMFKarpehMS. Selection of patients with gastric adenocarcinoma for laparoscopic staging. Am J Surg2006;191:134138.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 29.

    BentremDWiltonAMazumdarM. The value of peritoneal cytology as a preoperative predictor in patients with gastric carcinoma undergoing a curative resection. Ann Surg Oncol2005;12:347353.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30.

    MezhirJJShahMAJacksLM. Positive peritoneal cytology in patients with gastric cancer: natural history and outcome of 291 patients. Ann Surg Oncol2010;17:31733180.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 31.

    De AndradeJPMezhirJJ. The critical role of peritoneal cytology in the staging of gastric cancer: an evidence-based review. J Surg Oncol2014;110:291297.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 32.

    HechtmanJFPolydoridesAD. HER2/neu gene amplification and protein overexpression in gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: a review of histopathology, diagnostic testing, and clinical implications. Arch Pathol Lab Med2012;136:691697.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 33.

    TannerMHollmenMJunttilaTT. Amplification of HER-2 in gastric carcinoma: association with topoisomerase IIalpha gene amplification, intestinal type, poor prognosis and sensitivity to trastuzumab. Ann Oncol2005;16:273278.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 34.

    YanBYauEXBte OmarSS. A study of HER2 gene amplification and protein expression in gastric cancer. J Clin Pathol2010;63:839842.

  • 35.

    ChuaTCMerrettND. Clinicopathologic factors associated with HER2-positive gastric cancer and its impact on survival outcomes—a systematic review. Int J Cancer2012;130:28452856.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 36.

    Gomez-MartinCGarraldaEEcharriMJ. HER2/neu testing for anti-HER2-based therapies in patients with unresectable and/or metastatic gastric cancer. J Clin Pathol2012;65:751757.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 37.

    KunzPLMojtahedAFisherGA. HER2 expression in gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma in a US population: clinicopathologic analysis with proposed approach to HER2 assessment. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol2012;20:13-24.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 38.

    JanjigianYYWernerDPauligkC. Prognosis of metastatic gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancer by HER2 status: a European and USA International collaborative analysis. Ann Oncol2012;23:26562662.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 39.

    BangYChungHXuJ. Pathological features of advanced gastric cancer (GC): Relationship to human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) positivity in the global screening programme of the ToGA trial [abstract]. J Clin Oncol2009;27 (Suppl 15):Abstract 4556.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 40.

    GravalosCJimenoA. HER2 in gastric cancer: a new prognostic factor and a novel therapeutic target. Ann Oncol2008;19:15231529.

  • 41.

    JorgensenJTHersomM. HER2 as a prognostic marker in gastric cancer: a systematic analysis of data from the literature. J Cancer2012;3:137144.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 42.

    GrabschHSivakumarSGrayS. HER2 expression in gastric cancer: rare, heterogeneous and of no prognostic value—conclusions from 924 cases of two independent series. Cell Oncol2010;32:5765.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 43.

    HofmannMStossOShiD. Assessment of a HER2 scoring system for gastric cancer: results from a validation study. Histopathology2008;52:797805.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 44.

    RuschoffJDietelMBarettonG. HER2 diagnostics in gastric cancer-guideline validation and development of standardized immunohistochemical testing. Virchows Arch2010;457:299307.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 45.

    BangYJVan CutsemEFeyereislovaA. Trastuzumab in combination with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for treatment of HER2-positive advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer (ToGA): a phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet2010;376:687697.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 46.

    Barros-SilvaJDLeitaoDAfonsoL. Association of ERBB2 gene status with histopathological parameters and disease-specific survival in gastric carcinoma patients. Br J Cancer2009;100:487493.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 47.

    GlimeliusBHoffmanKHaglundU. Initial or delayed chemotherapy with best supportive care in advanced gastric cancer. Ann Oncol1994;5:189190.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 48.

    PyrhonenSKuitunenTNyandotoPKouriM. Randomised comparison of fluorouracil, epidoxorubicin and methotrexate (FEMTX) plus supportive care with supportive care alone in patients with non-resectable gastric cancer. Br J Cancer1995;71:587591.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 49.

    CullinanSAMoertelCGFlemingTR. A comparison of three chemotherapeutic regimens in the treatment of advanced pancreatic and gastric carcinoma. Fluorouracil vs fluorouracil and doxorubicin vs fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and mitomycin. JAMA1985;253:20612067.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 50.

    WilsJAKleinHOWagenerDJ. Sequential high-dose methotrexate and fluorouracil combined with doxorubicin--a step ahead in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer: a trial of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Gastrointestinal Tract Cooperative Group. J Clin Oncol1991;9:827831.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 51.

    WebbACunninghamDScarffeJH. Randomized trial comparing epirubicin, cisplatin, and fluorouracil versus fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and methotrexate in advanced esophagogastric cancer. J Clin Oncol1997;15:261267.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 52.

    VanhoeferURougierPWilkeH. Final results of a randomized phase III trial of sequential high-dose methotrexate, fluorouracil, and doxorubicin versus etoposide, leucovorin, and fluorouracil versus infusional fluorouracil and cisplatin in advanced gastric cancer: a trial of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Gastrointestinal Tract Cancer Cooperative Group. J Clin Oncol2000;18:26482657.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 53.

    RossPNicolsonMCunninghamD. Prospective randomized trial comparing mitomycin, cisplatin, and protracted venous-infusion fluorouracil (PVI 5-FU) With epirubicin, cisplatin, and PVI 5-FU in advanced esophagogastric cancer. J Clin Oncol2002;20:19962004.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 54.

    LouvetCAndreTTigaudJM. Phase II study of oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and folinic acid in locally advanced or metastatic gastric cancer patients. J Clin Oncol2002;20:45434548.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 55.

    Al-BatranS-EAtmacaAHegewisch-BeckerS. Phase II trial of biweekly infusional fluorouracil, folinic acid, and oxaliplatin in patients with advanced gastric cancer. J Clin Oncol2004;22:658663.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 56.

    Al-BatranS-EHartmannJTProbstS. Phase III trial in metastatic gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma with fluorouracil, leucovorin plus either oxaliplatin or cisplatin: a study of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Internistische Onkologie. J Clin Oncol2008;26:14351442.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 57.

    CunninghamDStarlingNRaoS. Capecitabine and oxaliplatin for advanced esophagogastric cancer. N Engl J Med2008;358:3646.

  • 58.

    KangYKKangWKShinDB. Capecitabine/cisplatin versus 5-fluorouracil/cisplatin as first-line therapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer: a randomised phase III noninferiority trial. Ann Oncol2009;20:666673.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 59.

    OkinesAFCNormanARMcCloudP. Meta-analysis of the REAL-2 and ML17032 trials: evaluating capecitabine-based combination chemotherapy and infused 5-fluorouracil-based combination chemotherapy for the treatment of advanced oesophago-gastric cancer. Ann Oncol2009;20:15291534.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 60.

    Van CutsemEMoiseyenkoVMTjulandinS. Phase III study of docetaxel and cisplatin plus fluorouracil compared with cisplatin and fluorouracil as first-line therapy for advanced gastric cancer: a report of the V325 Study Group. J Clin Oncol2006;24:49914997.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 61.

    RothADFazioNStuppR. Docetaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil; docetaxel and cisplatin; and epirubicin, cisplatin, and fluorouracil as systemic treatment for advanced gastric carcinoma: a randomized phase II trial of the Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research. J Clin Oncol2007;25:32173223.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 62.

    Al-BatranSEHartmannJTHofheinzR. Biweekly fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and docetaxel (FLOT) for patients with metastatic adenocarcinoma of the stomach or esophagogastric junction: a phase II trial of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Internistische Onkologie. Ann Oncol2008;19:18821887.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 63.

    ElkermYMElsaidAAL-BatranSPauligkC. Final results of a phase II trial of docetaxel-carboplatin-FU in locally advanced gastric carcinoma [abstract]. Presented at the 2008 Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium 2008. Abstract 38.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 64.

    InalAKaplanMAKucukonerMIsikdoganA. Docetaxel and cisplatin plus fluorouracil compared with modified docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil as first-line therapy for advanced gastric cancer: a retrospective analysis of single institution. Neoplasma2012;59:233236.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 65.

    Di LauroLViciPBelliF. Docetaxel, oxaliplatin, and capecitabine combination chemotherapy for metastatic gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer2014;17:718724.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 66.

    Van CutsemEBoniCTaberneroJ. Docetaxel plus oxaliplatin with or without fluorouracil or capecitabine in metastatic or locally recurrent gastric cancer: a randomized phase II study. Ann Oncol2015;26:149156.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 67.

    ShahMAJanjigianYYStollerR. Randomized multicenter phase II study of modified docetaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil (DCF) versus DCF plus growth factor support in patients with metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma: a study of the US Gastric Cancer Consortium. J Clin Oncol2015;33:38743879.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 68.

    DankMZaluskiJBaroneC. Randomized phase III study comparing irinotecan combined with 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid to cisplatin combined with 5-fluorouracil in chemotherapy naive patients with advanced adenocarcinoma of the stomach or esophagogastric junction. Ann Oncol2008;19:14501457.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 69.

    MoehlerMKanzlerSGeisslerM. A randomized multicenter phase II study comparing capecitabine with irinotecan or cisplatin in metastatic adenocarcinoma of the stomach or esophagogastric junction. Ann Oncol2010;21:7177.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 70.

    GuimbaudRLouvetCRiesP. Prospective, randomized, multicenter, phase iii study of fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan versus epirubicin, cisplatin, and capecitabine in advanced gastric adenocarcinoma: a French Intergroup (Federation Francophone de Cancerologie Digestive, Federation Nationale des Centres de Lutte Contre le Cancer, and Groupe Cooperateur Multidisciplinaire en Oncologie) study. J Clin Oncol2014;32:35203526.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 71.

    GiulianiFMolicaSMaielloE. Irinotecan (CPT-11) and mitomycin-C (MMC) as second-line therapy in advanced gastric cancer: a phase II study of the Gruppo Oncologico dell' Italia Meridionale (prot. 2106). Am J Clin Oncol2005;28:581585.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 72.

    LearyAAssersohnLCunninghamD. A phase II trial evaluating capecitabine and irinotecan as second line treatment in patients with oesophago-gastric cancer who have progressed on, or within 3 months of platinum-based chemotherapy. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol2009;64:455462.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 73.

    HawkesEOkinesAFPapamichaelD. Docetaxel and irinotecan as second-line therapy for advanced oesophagogastric cancer. Eur J Cancer2011; 47:11461151.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 74.

    HironakaSUedaSYasuiH. Randomized, open-label, phase III atudy comparing irinotecan with paclitaxel in patients with advanced gastric cancer without severe peritoneal metastasis after failure of prior combination chemotherapy using fluoropyrimidine plus platinum: WJOG 4007 Trial. J Clin Oncol2013;31:44384444.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 75.

    Maugeri-SaccaMPizzutiLSergiD. FOLFIRI as a second-line therapy in patients with docetaxel-pretreated gastric cancer: a historical cohort. J Exp Clin Cancer Res2013;32:67.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 76.

    SymSJHongJParkJ. A randomized phase II study of biweekly irinotecan monotherapy or a combination of irinotecan plus 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (mFOLFIRI) in patients with metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma refractory to or progressive after first-line chemotherapy. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol2013;71:481488.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 77.

    KoizumiWNaraharaHHaraT. S-1 plus cisplatin versus S-1 alone for first-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer (SPIRITS trial): a phase III trial. Lancet Oncol2008;9:215221.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 78.

    AjaniJALeeF-CSinghDA. Multicenter phase II trial of S-1 plus cisplatin in patients with untreated advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. J Clin Oncol2006;24:663667.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 79.

    LenzH-JLeeF-CHallerDG. Extended safety and efficacy data on S-1 plus cisplatin in patients with untreated, advanced gastric carcinoma in a multicenter phase II study. Cancer2007;109:3340.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 80.

    AjaniJARodriguezWBodokyG. Multicenter phase III comparison of cisplatin/S-1 with cisplatin/infusional fluorouracil in advanced gastric or gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma study: the FLAGS trial. J Clin Oncol2010;28:15471553.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 81.

    AjaniJABuyseMLichinitserM. Combination of cisplatin/S-1 in the treatment of patients with advanced gastric or gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma: Results of noninferiority and safety analyses compared with cisplatin/5-fluorouracil in the First-Line Advanced Gastric Cancer Study. Eur J Cancer2013;49:36163624.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 82.

    FuchsCSTomasekJYongCJ. Ramucirumab monotherapy for previously treated advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (REGARD): an international, randomised, multicentre, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet2014;383:3139.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 83.

    WilkeHMuroKVan CutsemE. Ramucirumab plus paclitaxel versus placebo plus paclitaxel in patients with previously treated advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (RAINBOW): a double-blind, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol2014;15:12241235.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 84.

    BrarSSMaharALHelyerLK. Processes of care in the multidisciplinary treatment of gastric cancer: results of a RAND/UCLA expert panel. JAMA Surg2014;149:1825.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 85.

    JadvarHTatlidilRGarciaAAContiPS. Evaluation of recurrent gastric malignancy with [F-18]-FDG positron emission tomography. Clin Radiol2003;58:215221.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 86.

    OttKFinkUBeckerK. Prediction of response to preoperative chemotherapy in gastric carcinoma by metabolic imaging: results of a prospective trial. J Clin Oncol2003;21:46044610.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 87.

    OttKHerrmannKLordickF. Early metabolic response evaluation by fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography allows in vivo testing of chemosensitivity in gastric cancer: long-term results of a prospective study. Clin Cancer Res2008;14:20122018.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 88.

    VallbohmerDHolscherAHSchneiderPM. [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography for the assessment of histopathologic response and prognosis after completion of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in gastric cancer. J Surg Oncol2010;102:135140.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 89.

    TianJChenLWeiB. The value of vesicant 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18F-FDG PET) in gastric malignancies. Nucl Med Commun2004;25:825831.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 90.

    GlimeliusBEkstromKHoffmanK. Randomized comparison between chemotherapy plus best supportive care with best supportive care in advanced gastric cancer. Ann Oncol1997;8:163168.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 91.

    Thuss-PatiencePCKretzschmarABichevD. Survival advantage for irinotecan versus best supportive care as second-line chemotherapy in gastric cancer--a randomised phase III study of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Internistische Onkologie (AIO). Eur J Cancer2011;47:23062314.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 92.

    KangJHLeeSILim doH. Salvage chemotherapy for pretreated gastric cancer: a randomized phase III trial comparing chemotherapy plus best supportive care with best supportive care alone. J Clin Oncol2012;30:15131518.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 93.

    FordERMarshallABridgewaterJA. Docetaxel versus active symptom control for refractory oesophagogastric adenocarcinoma (COUGAR-02): an open-label, phase 3 randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol2014;15:7886.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 94.

    KarnofskyDABurchenalJH. The clinical evaluation of chemotherapeutic agents in cancer. In: MacLeodCM ed. Evaluation of Chemotherapeutic Agents. New YorkColumbia University Press; 1949:199205.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 95.

    OkenMMCreechRHTormeyDC. Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Am J Clin Oncol1982;5:649655.

  • 96.

    SchagCCHeinrichRLGanzPA. Karnofsky performance status revisited: reliability, validity, and guidelines. J Clin Oncol1984;2:187193.

  • 97.

    ImbesiJJKurtzRC. A multidisciplinary approach to gastrointestinal bleeding in cancer patients. J Support Oncol2005;3:101110.

  • 98.

    KimYIChoiIJ. Endoscopic management of tumor bleeding from inoperable gastric cancer. Clin Endosc2015;48:121127.

  • 99.

    SheibaniSKimJJChenB. Natural history of acute upper GI bleeding due to tumours: short-term success and long-term recurrence with or without endoscopic therapy. Aliment Pharmacol Ther2013;38:144150.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 100.

    KimMMRanaVJanjanNA. Clinical benefit of palliative radiation therapy in advanced gastric cancer. Acta Oncol2008;47:421427.

  • 101.

    KondohCShitaraKNomuraM. Efficacy of palliative radiotherapy for gastric bleeding in patients with unresectable advanced gastric cancer: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Palliat Care2015;14:37.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 102.

    HoltAPPatelMAhmedMM. Palliation of patients with malignant gastroduodenal obstruction with self-expanding metallic stents: the treatment of choice?Gastrointest Endosc2004;60:10101017.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 103.

    LindsayJOAndreyevHJNVlavianosPWestabyD. Self-expanding metal stents for the palliation of malignant gastroduodenal obstruction in patients unsuitable for surgical bypass. Aliment Pharmacol Ther2004;19:901905.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 104.

    KimTOKangDHKimGH. Self-expandable metallic stents for palliation of patients with malignant gastric outlet obstruction caused by stomach cancer. World J Gastroenterol2007;13:916920.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 105.

    EndoSTakiguchiSMiyazakiY. Efficacy of endoscopic gastroduodenal stenting for gastric outlet obstruction due to unresectable advanced gastric cancer: a prospective multicenter study. J Surg Oncol2014;109:208212.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 106.

    LyJO'GradyGMittalA. A systematic review of methods to palliate malignant gastric outlet obstruction. Surg Endosc2010;24:290297.

  • 107.

    JeurninkSMvan EijckCHJSteyerbergEW. Stent versus gastrojejunostomy for the palliation of gastric outlet obstruction: a systematic review. BMC Gastroenterol2007;7:1827.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 108.

    JeurninkSMSteyerbergEWvan HooftJE. Surgical gastrojejunostomy or endoscopic stent placement for the palliation of malignant gastric outlet obstruction (SUSTENT study): a multicenter randomized trial. Gastrointest Endosc2010;71:490499.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 109.

    WollmanBD'AgostinoHB. Percutaneous radiologic and endoscopic gastrostomy: a 3-year institutional analysis of procedure performance. AJR Am J Roentgenol1997;169:15511553.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 110.

    SilasAMPearceLFLestinaLS. Percutaneous radiologic gastrostomy versus percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: a comparison of indications, complications and outcomes in 370 patients. Eur J Radiol2005;56:8490.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 111.

    IssakaRBShapiroDMParikhND. Palliative venting percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube is safe and effective in patients with malignant obstruction. Surg Endosc2014;28:16681673.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 112.

    LeeMJSainiSBrinkJA. Malignant small bowel obstruction and ascites: not a contraindication to percutaneous gastrostomy. Clin Radiol1991;44:332334.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 113.

    RyanJMHahnPFMuellerPR. Performing radiologic gastrostomy or gastrojejunostomy in patients with malignant ascites. AJR Am J Roentgenol1998;171:10031006.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 4712 4711 584
PDF Downloads 1262 1262 142
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0