Squamous cell carcinoma of the penis represents approximately 0.5% of all cancers among men in the United States and other developed countries. Although rare, it is associated with significant disfigurement, and only half of the patients survive beyond 5 years. Proper evaluation of both the primary lesion and lymph nodes is critical, because nodal involvement is the most important factor of survival. The NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology for Penile Cancer provide recommendations on the diagnosis and management of this devastating disease based on evidence and expert consensus.

  • 1.

    PettawayCALynchDJrDavisD. Tumors of the penis. In: WeinAJKavoussiLNovickAC eds. Campbell-Walsh Urology9th ed.Philadelphia: Saunders; 2007:959992.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2.

    SiegelRWardEBrawleyOJemalA. Cancer statistics, 2011: the impact of eliminating socioeconomic and racial disparities on premature cancer deaths. CA Cancer J Clin2011;61:212236.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3.

    Pow-SangMRFerreiraUPow-SangJM. Epidemiology and natural history of penile cancer. Urology2010;76:S26.

  • 4.

    HorenblasS. Lymphadenectomy for squamous cell carcinoma of the penis. Part 2: the role and technique of lymph node dissection. BJU Int2001;88:473483.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5.

    HernandezBYBarnholtz-SloanJGermanRR. Burden of invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the penis in the United States, 1998-2003. Cancer2008;113:28832891.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6.

    DillnerJvon KroghGHorenblasSMeijerCJ. Etiology of squamous cell carcinoma of the penis. Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl2000:189193.

  • 7.

    SufrinGHubenR. Benign and malignant lesions of the penis. In: GillenwaterJYGrayhackJTHowardsSSDuckettJW eds. Adult and Pediatric Urology2nd ed.Chicago: Mosby Year Book Medical Publishers; 1991:19972042.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8.

    DalingJRMadeleineMMJohnsonLG. Penile cancer: importance of circumcision, human papillomavirus and smoking in in situ and invasive disease. Int J Cancer2005;116:606616.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9.

    SarkarFHMilesBJPliethDHCrissmanJD. Detection of human papillomavirus in squamous neoplasm of the penis. J Urol1992;147:389392.

  • 10.

    EngelsEAPfeifferRMGoedertJJ. Trends in cancer risk among people with AIDS in the United States 1980-2002. AIDS2006;20:16451654.

  • 11.

    MadenCShermanKJBeckmannAM. History of circumcision, medical conditions, and sexual activity and risk of penile cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst1993;85:1924.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12.

    DepasqualeIParkAJBrackaA. The treatment of balanitis xerotica obliterans. BJU Int2000;86:459465.

  • 13.

    MicaliGNascaMRInnocenziDSchwartzRA. Penile cancer. J Am Acad Dermatol2006;54:369391.

  • 14.

    BarbagliGPalminteriEMirriF. Penile carcinoma in patients with genital lichen sclerosus: a multicenter survey. J Urol2006;175:13591363.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15.

    SternRS. Genital tumors among men with psoriasis exposed to psoralens and ultraviolet A radiation (PUVA) and ultraviolet B radiation. The Photochemotherapy Follow-up Study. N Engl J Med1990;322:10931097.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16.

    BleekerMCHeidemanDASnijdersPJ. Penile cancer: epidemiology, pathogenesis and prevention. World J Urol2009;27:141150.

  • 17.

    EdgeSBByrdDRComptonCC eds. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual7th ed.New York: Springer; 2010.

  • 18.

    CubillaALReuterVVelazquezE. Histologic classification of penile carcinoma and its relation to outcome in 61 patients with primary resection. Int J Surg Pathol2001;9:111120.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19.

    GuimaraesGCCunhaIWSoaresFA. Penile squamous cell carcinoma clinicopathological features, nodal metastasis and outcome in 333 cases. J Urol2009;182:528534.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20.

    FicarraVAkdumanBBouchotO. Prognostic factors in penile cancer. Urology2010;76:S6673.

  • 21.

    BarocasDAChangSS. Penile cancer: clinical presentation, diagnosis, and staging. Urol Clin North Am2010;37:343–-352.

  • 22.

    LeijteJAGalleeMAntoniniNHorenblasS. Evaluation of current TNM classification of penile carcinoma. J Urol2008;180:933938.

  • 23.

    LeijteJAHorenblasS. Shortcomings of the current TNM classification for penile carcinoma: time for a change?World J Urol2009;27:151154.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24.

    SobinLHWittekindCInternational Union against Cancer. TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours6th ed.New York: Wiley-Liss; 2002.

  • 25.

    SlatonJWMorgensternNLevyDA. Tumor stage, vascular invasion and the percentage of poorly differentiated cancer: independent prognosticators for inguinal lymph node metastasis in penile squamous cancer. J Urol2001;165:11381142.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26.

    VelazquezEFAyalaGLiuH. Histologic grade and perineural invasion are more important than tumor thickness as predictor of nodal metastasis in penile squamous cell carcinoma invading 5 to 10 mm. Am J Surg Pathol2008;32:974979.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27.

    PizzocaroGAlgabaFHorenblasS. EAU penile cancer guidelines 2009. Eur Urol2010;57:10021012.

  • 28.

    LontAPBesnardAPGalleeMPW. A comparison of physical examination and imaging in determining the extent of primary penile carcinoma. BJU Int2003;91:493495.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 29.

    ChoiJWChoiMChoKH. A case of erythroplasia of queyrat treated with imiquimod 5% cream and excision. Ann Dermatol2009;21:419422.

  • 30.

    SchroederTLSengelmannRD. Squamous cell carcinoma in situ of the penis successfully treated with imiquimod 5% cream. J Am Acad Dermatol2002;46:545548.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 31.

    TaliaferroSJCohenGF. Bowen’s disease of the penis treated with topical imiquimod 5% cream. J Drugs Dermatol2008;7:483485.

  • 32.

    FeldmanASMcDougalWS. Long-term outcome of excisional organ sparing surgery for carcinoma of the penis. J Urol2011;186:13031307.

  • 33.

    BandieramonteGColecchiaMMarianiL. Peniscopically controlled CO2 laser excision for conservative treatment of in situ and T1 penile carcinoma: report on 224 patients. Eur Urol2008;54:875882.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 34.

    HorenblasSvan TinterenHDelemarreJF. Squamous cell carcinoma of the penis. II. Treatment of the primary tumor. J Urol1992;147:15331538.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 35.

    MorelliGPagniRMarianiC. Glansectomy with split-thickness skin graft for the treatment of penile carcinoma. Int J Impot Res2009;21:311314.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 36.

    O’KaneHFPahujaAHoKJ. Outcome of glansectomy and skin grafting in the management of penile cancer. Adv Urol2011;2011:240824.

  • 37.

    PietrzakPCorbishleyCWatkinN. Organ-sparing surgery for invasive penile cancer: early follow-up data. BJU Int2004;94:12531257.

  • 38.

    HatzichristouDGApostolidisATzortzisV. Glansectomy: an alternative surgical treatment for Buschke-Lowenstein tumors of the penis. Urology2001;57:966969.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 39.

    BissadaNKYakoutHHFahmyWE. Multi-institutional long-term experience with conservative surgery for invasive penile carcinoma. J Urol2003;169:500502.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 40.

    FrimbergerDHungerhuberEZaakD. Penile carcinoma. Is Nd:YAG laser therapy radical enough?J Urol2002;168:24182421.

  • 41.

    AzrifMLogueJPSwindellR. External-beam radiotherapy in T1-2 N0 penile carcinoma. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)2006;18:320325.

  • 42.

    CrookJGrimardLTsihliasJ. Interstitial brachytherapy for penile cancer: an alternative to amputation. J Urol2002;167:506511.

  • 43.

    RozanRAlbuissonEGiraudB. Interstitial brachytherapy for penile carcinoma: a multicentric survey (259 patients). Radiother Oncol1995;36:8393.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 44.

    ZouhairACouckePAJeanneretW. Radiation therapy alone or combined surgery and radiation therapy in squamous-cell carcinoma of the penis?Eur J Cancer2001;37:198203.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 45.

    CrookJMaCGrimardL. Radiation therapy in the management of the primary penile tumor: an update. World J Urol2009;27:189196.

  • 46.

    HorenblasSvan TinterenH. Squamous cell carcinoma of the penis. IV. Prognostic factors of survival: analysis of tumor, nodes and metastasis classification system. J Urol1994;151:12391243.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 47.

    MinhasSKayesOHegartyP. What surgical resection margins are required to achieve oncological control in men with primary penile cancer?BJU Int2005;96:10401043.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 48.

    de CrevoisierRSlimaneKSanfilippoN. Long-term results of brachytherapy for carcinoma of the penis confined to the glans (N- or NX). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys2009;74:11501156.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 49.

    CrookJJezioranskiJCyglerJE. Penile brachytherapy: technical aspects and postimplant issues. Brachytherapy2010;9:151158.

  • 50.

    HeynsCFFleshnerNSangarV. Management of the lymph nodes in penile cancer. Urology2010;76:4357.

  • 51.

    SolsonaEAlgabaFHorenblasS. EAU Guidelines on Penile Cancer. Eur Urol2004;46:18.

  • 52.

    KroonBKValdes OlmosRAvan TinterenH. Reproducibility of lymphoscintigraphy for lymphatic mapping in patients with penile carcinoma. J Urol2005;174:22142217.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 53.

    HughesBLeijteJShabbirM. Non-invasive and minimally invasive staging of regional lymph nodes in penile cancer. World J Urol2009;27:197203.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 54.

    Mueller-LisseUGScherBScherrMKSeitzM. Functional imaging in penile cancer: PET/computed tomography, MRI, and sentinel lymph node biopsy. Curr Opin Urol2008;18:105110.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 55.

    ScherBSeitzMAlbingerW. Value of PET and PET/CT in the diagnostics of prostate and penile cancer. Recent Results Cancer Res2008;170:159179.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 56.

    ScherBSeitzMReiserM. 18F-FDG PET/CT for staging of penile cancer. J Nucl Med2005;46:14601465.

  • 57.

    TabatabaeiSHarisinghaniMMcDougalWS. Regional lymph node staging using lymphotropic nanoparticle enhanced magnetic resonance imaging with ferumoxtran-10 in patients with penile cancer. J Urol2005;174:923927.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 58.

    CasoJRRodriguezARCorreaJSpiessPE. Update in the management of penile cancer. Int Braz J Urol2009;35:406415.

  • 59.

    PizzocaroGPivaLBandieramonteGTanaS. Up-to-date management of carcinoma of the penis. Eur Urol1997;32:515.

  • 60.

    SolsonaEIborraIRubioJ. Prospective validation of the association of local tumor stage and grade as a predictive factor for occult lymph node micrometastasis in patients with penile carcinoma and clinically negative inguinal lymph nodes. J Urol2001;165:15061509.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 61.

    VillavicencioHRubio-BrionesJRegaladoR. Grade, local stage and growth pattern as prognostic factors in carcinoma of the penis. Eur Urol1997;32:442447.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 62.

    CabanasRM. An approach for the treatment of penile carcinoma. Cancer1977;39:456466.

  • 63.

    PettawayCAPistersLLDinneyCP. Sentinel lymph node dissection for penile carcinoma: the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center experience. J Urol1995;154:19992003.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 64.

    LeijteJAKroonBKValdes OlmosRA. Reliability and safety of current dynamic sentinel node biopsy for penile carcinoma. Eur Urol2007;52:170177.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 65.

    Valdes OlmosRATanisPJHoefnagelCA. Penile lymphoscintigraphy for sentinel node identification. Eur J Nucl Med2001;28:581585.

  • 66.

    Gonzaga-SilvaLFTavaresJMFreitasFC. The isolated gamma probe technique for sentinel node penile carcinoma detection is unreliable. Int Braz J Urol2007;33:5863.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 67.

    KroonBKHorenblasSMeinhardtW. Dynamic sentinel node biopsy in penile carcinoma: evaluation of 10 years experience. Eur Urol2005;47:601606.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 68.

    SpiessPEIzawaJIBassettR. Preoperative lymphoscintigraphy and dynamic sentinel node biopsy for staging penile cancer: results with pathological correlation. J Urol2007;177:21572161.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 69.

    TanisPJLontAPMeinhardtW. Dynamic sentinel node biopsy for penile cancer: reliability of a staging technique. J Urol2002;168:7680.

  • 70.

    KroonBKHorenblasSEstourgieSH. How to avoid false-negative dynamic sentinel node procedures in penile carcinoma. J Urol2004;171:21912194.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 71.

    KroonBKHorenblasSDeurlooEE. Ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology before sentinel node biopsy in patients with penile carcinoma. BJU Int2005;95:517521.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 72.

    CrawshawJWHadwayPHofflandD. Sentinel lymph node biopsy using dynamic lymphoscintigraphy combined with ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration in penile carcinoma. Br J Radiol2009;82:4148.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 73.

    HadwayPSmithYCorbishleyC. Evaluation of dynamic lymphoscintigraphy and sentinel lymph-node biopsy for detecting occult metastases in patients with penile squamous cell carcinoma. BJU Int2007;100:561565.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 74.

    FicarraVGalfanoA. Should the dynamic sentinel node biopsy (DSNB) be considered the gold standard in the evaluation of lymph node status in patients with penile carcinoma?Eur Urol2007;52:1719.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 75.

    StancikIHoltlW. Penile cancer: review of the recent literature. Curr Opin Urol2003;13:467472.

  • 76.

    KroonBKHorenblasSLontAP. Patients with penile carcinoma benefit from immediate resection of clinically occult lymph node metastases. J Urol2005;173:816819.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 77.

    McDougalWS. Preemptive lymphadenectomy markedly improves survival in patients with cancer of the penis who harbor occult metastases. J Urol2005;173:681.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 78.

    SharpDSAngermeierKW. Surgery of penile and urethral carcinoma. In: WeinAJKavoussiLNovickAC eds. Campbell-Walsh Urology9th ed.Philadelphia: Saunders; 2007:9931022.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 79.

    CatalonaWJ. Re: Modified inguinal lymphadenectomy for carcinoma of the penis with preservation of saphenous veins: technique and preliminary results. J Urol1988;140:836.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 80.

    LopesARossiBMFonsecaFPMoriniS. Unreliability of modified inguinal lymphadenectomy for clinical staging of penile carcinoma. Cancer1996;77:20992102.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 81.

    ProtzelCAlcarazAHorenblasS. Lymphadenectomy in the surgical management of penile cancer. Eur Urol2009;55:10751088.

  • 82.

    BermejoCBusbyJESpiessPE. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by aggressive surgical consolidation for metastatic penile squamous cell carcinoma. J Urol2007;177:13351338.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 83.

    PagliaroLCCrookJ. Multimodality therapy in penile cancer: when and which treatments?World J Urol2009;27:221225.

  • 84.

    SpiessPEHernandezMSPettawayCA. Contemporary inguinal lymph node dissection: minimizing complications. World J Urol2009;27:205212.

  • 85.

    LontAPKroonBKGalleeMP. Pelvic lymph node dissection for penile carcinoma: extent of inguinal lymph node involvement as an indicator for pelvic lymph node involvement and survival. J Urol2007;177:947952.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 86.

    Tobias-MachadoMTavaresAMolinaWR. Video endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy (VEIL): minimally invasive resection of inguinal lymph nodes. Int Braz J Urol2006;32:316321.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 87.

    Tobias-MachadoMTavaresAOrnellasAA. Video endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy: a new minimally invasive procedure for radical management of inguinal nodes in patients with penile squamous cell carcinoma. J Urol2007;177:953957.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 88.

    Tobias-MachadoMTavaresASilvaMN. Can video endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy achieve a lower morbidity than open lymph node dissection in penile cancer patients?J Endourol2008;22:16871691.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 89.

    BishoffJTLacklandAFBaslerJW. Endoscopic subcutaneous modified inguinal lymph node dissection (ESMIL) for squamous cell carcinoma of the penis. J Urol2003;169(Suppl):78.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 90.

    SoteloRSanchez-SalasRCarmonaO. Endoscopic lymphadenectomy for penile carcinoma. J Endourol2007;21:364367.

  • 91.

    HaasGPBlumensteinBAGaglianoRG. Cisplatin, methotrexate and bleomycin for the treatment of carcinoma of the penis: a Southwest Oncology Group study. J Urol1999;161:18231825.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 92.

    PagliaroLCWilliamsDLDalianiD. Neoadjuvant paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and cisplatin chemotherapy for metastatic penile cancer: a phase II study. J Clin Oncol2010;28:38513857.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 93.

    TheodorescuDRussoPZhangZF. Outcomes of initial surveillance of invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the penis and negative nodes. J Urol1996;155:16261631.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 94.

    LeijteJAHughesBGraaflandNM. Two-center evaluation of dynamic sentinel node biopsy for squamous cell carcinoma of the penis. J Clin Oncol2009;27:33253329.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 95.

    LontAPHorenblasSTanisPJ. Management of clinically node negative penile carcinoma: improved survival after the introduction of dynamic sentinel node biopsy. J Urol2003;170:783786.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 96.

    LeijteJAKirranderPAntoniniN. Recurrence patterns of squamous cell carcinoma of the penis: recommendations for follow-up based on a two-centre analysis of 700 patients. Eur Urol2008;54:161168.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 97.

    ChauxAReuterVLezcanoC. Comparison of morphologic features and outcome of resected recurrent and nonrecurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the penis: a study of 81 cases. Am J Surg Pathol2009;33:12991306.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 98.

    OrnellasAANobregaBLWei Kin ChinE. Prognostic factors in invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the penis: analysis of 196 patients treated at the Brazilian National Cancer Institute. J Urol2008;180:13541359.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 99.

    GraaflandNMMoonenLMvan BovenHH. Inguinal recurrence following therapeutic lymphadenectomy for node positive penile carcinoma: outcome and implications for management. J Urol2011;185:888893.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 100.

    LopesABezerraALSerranoSVHidalgoGS. Iliac nodal metastases from carcinoma of the penis treated surgically. BJU Int2000;86:690693.

  • 101.

    Pow-SangJEBenaventeVPow-SangJMPow-SangM. Bilateral ilioinguinal lymph node dissection in the management of cancer of the penis. Semin Surg Oncol1990;6:241242.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 102.

    RaviR. Morbidity following groin dissection for penile carcinoma. Br J Urol1993;72:941945.

  • 103.

    Sanchez-OrtizRFPettawayCA. The role of lymphadenectomy in penile cancer. Urol Oncol2004;22:236244.

  • 104.

    SrinivasVMorseMJHerrHW. Penile cancer: relation of extent of nodal metastasis to survival. J Urol1987;137:880882.

  • 105.

    CulkinDJBeerTM. Advanced penile carcinoma. J Urol2003;170:359365.

  • 106.

    PettawayCAPagliaroLTheodoreCHaasG. Treatment of visceral, unresectable, or bulky/unresectable regional metastases of penile cancer. Urology2010;76:5865.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 284 284 19
PDF Downloads 41 41 0
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0