Impact of the 7th Edition AJCC Staging Classification on the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology for Gastric and Esophageal Cancers

Restricted access

The 7th edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual has attempted to harmonize gastric and esophageal cancers, including management of gastroesophageal junction (GEJ)-type tumors. The treatment of complex tumor types is best guided by a staging classification that reliably groups patients according to prognosis and therapy. This article reviews and discusses these changes with the goal of elucidating key features of the staging system and outlining how these changes relate to the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology with regard to the care and treatment of patients. The 7th edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual has certainly improved harmonization of gastric and distal esophageal/GEJ-type adenocarcinomas, although issues persist, particularly regarding the optimal neoadjuvant treatment for the management of GEJ carcinomas.

Correspondence: Vivian E. Strong, MD, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, H-1217, New York, NY 10065. E-mail: strongv@mskcc.org
  • 1

    AjaniJABarthelJSBekaii-SaabT. Esophageal cancer. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw2008;6:818849.

  • 2

    EdgeSBByrdDRComptonCC eds. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual7th ed.New York, NY: Springer-Verlag; 2009:103115.

  • 3

    RiceTWBlackstoneEHRuschVW. 7th Edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual: esophagus and esophagogastric junction. Ann Surg Oncol2010;17:17211724.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4

    SiewertJRSteinHJ. Carcinoma of the cardia: carcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction—classification, pathology and extent of resection. Dis Esophagus1996;9:173182.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5

    ShaheenNJSharmaPOverholtBF. Radiofrequency ablation in Barrett’s esophagus with dysplasia. N Engl J Med2009;360:22772289.

  • 6

    FujitaHSueyoshiSYamanaH. Optimum treatment strategy for superficial esophageal cancer: endoscopic mucosal resection versus radical esophagectomy. World J Surg2001;25:424431.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7

    UrschelJVasanH. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that compared neoadjuvant chemoradiation and surgery to surgery alone for resectable esophageal cancer. Am J Surg2003;185:538543.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8

    HofstetterWL. Lymph node dissection in esophageal cancer. Current therapies in thoracic and cardiovascular surgery. In: YangSCCameronDE eds. Philadelphia, PA: Mosby, Inc.; 2004:360363.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9

    RizkNVenkatramanEParkB. The prognostic importance of the number of involved lymph nodes in esophageal cancer: implications for revisions of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2006;132:13741381.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10

    StrongVESongKYParkCH. Comparison of gastric cancer survival following R0 resection in the United States and Korea using an internationally validated nomogram. Ann Surg2010;251:640646.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11

    MezhirJJShahMAJacksL. Positive peritoneal cytology in patients with gastric cancer: natural history and outcome of 291 patientsAnn Surg Oncol2010;17:31733180.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12

    KarpehMSLeonLKlimstraDBrennanMF. Lymph node staging in gastric cancer: is location more important than number? An analysis of 1038 patients. Ann Surg2000;232:362371.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13

    SarelaAIMinerTJKarpehMS. Clinical outcomes with laparoscopic stage M1 unresected gastric adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg Onc2006;243:189195.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14

    CooperJSGuoMDHerskovicA. Chemoradiotherapy of locally advanced esophageal cancer: long-term follow-up of a prospective randomized trial (RTOG 85-01). Radiation Therapy Oncology Group. JAMA1999;281:16231627.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 196 196 48
PDF Downloads 30 30 2
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0