Lung Cancer Screening

Restricted access
  • 1

    U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The Health Consequences of Smoking: A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health; 2004.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2

    Thun MJ, Henley SJ, Burns D et al. . Lung cancer death rates in lifelong nonsmokers. J Natl Cancer Inst 2006;98:691699.

  • 3

    Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM et al. . Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 2011;61:6990.

  • 4

    Siegel R, Ward E, Brawley O, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2011: the impact of eliminating socioeconomic and racial disparities on premature cancer deaths. CA Cancer J Clin 2011;61:212236.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5

    Goldstraw P, Crowley J, Chansky K et al. . The IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project: proposals for the revision of the TNM stage groupings in the forthcoming (seventh) edition of the TNM classification of malignant tumours. J Thorac Oncol 2007;2:706714.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6

    Jemal A, Thun MJ, Ries LA et al. . Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975–2005, featuring trends in lung cancer, tobacco use, and tobacco control. J Natl Cancer Inst 2008;100:16721694.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7

    Aberle DR, Berg CD, Black WC et al. . The National Lung Screening Trial: overview and study design. Radiology 2011;258:243253.

  • 8

    Aberle DR, Adams AM, Berg CD et al. . Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. N Engl J Med 2011;365:395409.

  • 9

    Lee CI, Forman HP. CT screening for lung cancer: implications on social responsibility. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007;188:297298.

  • 10

    Welch HG, Black WC. Overdiagnosis in cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2010;102:605613.

  • 11

    Hulka BS. Cancer screening. Degrees of proof and practical application. Cancer 1988;62:17761780.

  • 12

    Humphrey LL, Johnson M, Teutsch S. Lung cancer screening: an update for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK42872/. Accessed January 9, 2012.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13

    Reich JM. A critical appraisal of overdiagnosis: estimates of its magnitude and implications for lung cancer screening. Thorax 2008;63:377383.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14

    Godoy MC, Naidich DP. Subsolid pulmonary nodules and the spectrum of peripheral adenocarcinomas of the lung: recommended interim guidelines for assessment and management. Radiology 2009;253:606622.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15

    Black WC. Computed tomography screening for lung cancer: review of screening principles and update on current status. Cancer 2007;110:23702384.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16

    van Iersel CA, de Koning HJ, Draisma G et al. . Risk-based selection from the general population in a screening trial: selection criteria, recruitment and power for the Dutch-Belgian randomised lung cancer multi-slice CT screening trial (NELSON). Int J Cancer 2007;120:868874.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17

    Smoking-attributable mortality, years of potential life lost, and productivity losses—United States, 2000-2004. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2008;57:12261228.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18

    Peto R, Darby S, Deo H et al. . Smoking, smoking cessation, and lung cancer in the UK since 1950: combination of national statistics with two case-control studies. BMJ 2000;321:323329.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19

    Garfinkel L. Time trends in lung cancer mortality among nonsmokers and a note on passive smoking. J Natl Cancer Inst 1981;66:10611066.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20

    U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The Health Consequences of Involuntary Exposure to Tobacco Smoke: A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Departmsnt of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Coordinating Center for Health Promotion, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health; 2006.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21

    Hackshaw AK, Law MR, Wald NJ. The accumulated evidence on lung cancer and environmental tobacco smoke. BMJ 1997;315:980988.

  • 22

    Driscoll T, Nelson DI, Steenland K et al. . The global burden of disease due to occupational carcinogens. Am J Ind Med 2005;48:419431.

  • 23

    Nelson DI, Concha-Barrientos M, Driscoll T et al. . The global burden of selected occupational diseases and injury risks: methodology and summary. Am J Ind Med 2005;48:400418.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24

    Nurminen M, Karjalainen A. Epidemiologic estimate of the proportion of fatalities related to occupational factors in Finland. Scand J Work Environ Health 2001;27:161213.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25

    Steenland K, Loomis D, Shy C, Simonsen N. Review of occupational lung carcinogens. Am J Ind Med 1996;29:474490.

  • 26

    Reid A, de Klerk NH, Ambrosini GL et al. . The risk of lung cancer with increasing time since ceasing exposure to asbestos and quitting smoking. Occup Environ Med 2006;63:509512.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27

    El Ghissassi F, Baan R, Straif K et al. . A review of human carcinogens—part D: radiation. Lancet Oncol 2009;10:751752.

  • 28

    Leuraud K, Schnelzer M, Tomasek L et al. . Radon, smoking and lung cancer risk: results of a joint analysis of three European case-control studies among uranium miners. Radiat Res 2011;176:375387.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 29

    Lubin JH, Boice JD Jr. Lung cancer risk from residential radon: meta-analysis of eight epidemiologic studies. J Natl Cancer Inst 1997;89:4957.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30

    Darby S, Hill D, Auvinen A et al. . Radon in homes and risk of lung cancer: collaborative analysis of individual data from 13 European case-control studies. BMJ 2005;330:223.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 31

    Tucker MA, Murray N, Shaw EG et al. . Second primary cancers related to smoking and treatment of small-cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer Working Cadre. J Natl Cancer Inst 1997;89:17821788.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 32

    Travis LB, Gospodarowicz M, Curtis RE et al. . Lung cancer following chemotherapy and radiotherapy for Hodgkin’s disease. J Natl Cancer Inst 2002;94:182192.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 33

    Jones AS, Morar P, Phillips DE et al. . Second primary tumors in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer 1995;75:13431353.

  • 34

    Atabek U, Mohit-Tabatabai MA, Raina S et al. . Lung cancer in patients with head and neck cancer. Incidence and long-term survival. Am J Surg 1987;154:434438.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 35

    Richardson GE, Tucker MA, Venzon DJ et al. . Smoking cessation after successful treatment of small-cell lung cancer is associated with fewer smoking-related second primary cancers. Ann Intern Med 1993;119:383390.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 36

    Jonsson S, Thorsteinsdottir U, Gudbjartsson DF et al. . Familial risk of lung carcinoma in the Icelandic population. JAMA 2004;292:29772983.

  • 37

    Li X, Hemminki K. Familial multiple primary lung cancers: a population-based analysis from Sweden. Lung Cancer 2005;47:301307.

  • 38

    Matakidou A, Eisen T, Houlston RS. Systematic review of the relationship between family history and lung cancer risk. Br J Cancer 2005;93:825833.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 39

    Bailey-Wilson JE, Amos CI, Pinney SM et al. . A major lung cancer susceptibility locus maps to chromosome 6q23-25. Am J Hum Genet 2004;75:460474.

  • 40

    Thorgeirsson TE, Geller F, Sulem P et al. . A variant associated with nicotine dependence, lung cancer and peripheral arterial disease. Nature 2008;452:638642.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 41

    Hung RJ, McKay JD, Gaborieau V et al. . A susceptibility locus for lung cancer maps to nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subunit genes on 15q25. Nature 2008;452:633637.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 42

    Amos CI, Wu X, Broderick P et al. . Genome-wide association scan of tag SNPs identifies a susceptibility locus for lung cancer at 15q25.1. Nat Genet 2008;40:616622.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 43

    Lambrechts D, Buysschaert I, Zanen P et al. . The 15q24/25 susceptibility variant for lung cancer and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is associated with emphysema. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2010;181:486493.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 44

    Hwang SJ, Cheng LS, Lozano G et al. . Lung cancer risk in germline p53 mutation carriers: association between an inherited cancer predisposition, cigarette smoking, and cancer risk. Hum Genet 2003;113:238243.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 45

    Sanders BM, Jay M, Draper GJ, Roberts EM. Non-ocular cancer in relatives of retinoblastoma patients. Br J Cancer 1989;60:358365.

  • 46

    Fletcher O, Easton D, Anderson K et al. . Lifetime risks of common cancers among retinoblastoma survivors. J Natl Cancer Inst 2004;96:357363.

  • 47

    Mayne ST, Buenconsejo J, Janerich DT. Previous lung disease and risk of lung cancer among men and women nonsmokers. Am J Epidemiol 1999;149:1320.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 48

    Samet JM, Humble CG, Pathak DR. Personal and family history of respiratory disease and lung cancer risk. Am Rev Respir Dis 1986;134:466470.

  • 49

    Alavanja MC, Brownson RC, Boice JD Jr, Hock E. Preexisting lung disease and lung cancer among nonsmoking women. Am J Epidemiol 1992;136:623632.

  • 50

    Wu-Williams AH, Dai XD, Blot W et al. . Lung cancer among women in north-east China. Br J Cancer 1990;62:982987.

  • 51

    Gao YT, Blot WJ, Zheng W et al. . Lung cancer among Chinese women. Int J Cancer 1987;40:604609.

  • 52

    Brenner AV, Wang Z, Kleinerman RA et al. . Previous pulmonary diseases and risk of lung cancer in Gansu Province, China. Int J Epidemiol 2001;30:118124.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 53

    Skillrud DM, Offord KP, Miller RD. Higher risk of lung cancer in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. A prospective, matched, controlled study. Ann Intern Med 1986;105:503507.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 54

    Yang P, Sun Z, Krowka MJ et al. . Alpha1-antitrypsin deficiency carriers, tobacco smoke, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and lung cancer risk. Arch Intern Med 2008;168:10971103.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 55

    Koshiol J, Rotunno M, Consonni D et al. . Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and altered risk of lung cancer in a population-based case-control study. PLoS One 2009;4:e7380.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 56

    Turner MC, Chen Y, Krewski D et al. . Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is associated with lung cancer mortality in a prospective study of never smokers. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2007;176:285290.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 57

    Turner-Warwick M, Lebowitz M, Burrows B, Johnson A. Cryptogenic fibrosing alveolitis and lung cancer. Thorax 1980;35:496499.

  • 58

    Hubbard R, Venn A, Lewis S, Britton J. Lung cancer and cryptogenic fibrosing alveolitis. A population-based cohort study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000;161:58.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 59

    Hughes JM, Weill H. Asbestosis as a precursor of asbestos related lung cancer: results of a prospective mortality study. Br J Ind Med 1991;48:229233.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 60

    Chlebowski RT, Schwartz AG, Wakelee H et al. . Oestrogen plus progestin and lung cancer in postmenopausal women (Women’s Health Initiative trial): a post-hoc analysis of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2009;374:12431251.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 61

    Henschke CI, Yankelevitz DF, Libby DM et al. . Survival of patients with stage I lung cancer detected on CT screening. N Engl J Med 2006;355:17631771.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 62

    Li F, Sone S, Abe H et al. . Malignant versus benign nodules at CT screening for lung cancer: comparison of thin-section CT findings. Radiology 2004;233:793798.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 63

    Kim HY, Shim YM, Lee KS et al. . Persistent pulmonary nodular ground-glass opacity at thin-section CT: histopathologic comparisons. Radiology 2007;245:267275.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 64

    Travis WD, Brambilla E, Noguchi M et al. . International association for the study of lung cancer/american thoracic society/european respiratory society international multidisciplinary classification of lung adenocarcinoma. J Thorac Oncol 2011;6:244285.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 65

    Fischbach F, Knollmann F, Griesshaber V et al. . Detection of pulmonary nodules by multislice computed tomography: improved detection rate with reduced slice thickness. Eur Radiol 2003;13:23782383.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 66

    Valencia R, Denecke T, Lehmkuhl L et al. . Value of axial and coronal maximum intensity projection (MIP) images in the detection of pulmonary nodules by multislice spiral CT: comparison with axial 1-mm and 5-mm slices. Eur Radiol 2006;16:325332.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 67

    Kawel N, Seifert B, Luetolf M, Boehm T. Effect of slab thickness on the CT detection of pulmonary nodules: use of sliding thin-slab maximum intensity projection and volume rendering. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009;192:13241329.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 68

    Peloschek P, Sailer J, Weber M et al. . Pulmonary nodules: sensitivity of maximum intensity projection versus that of volume rendering of 3D multidetector CT data. Radiology 2007;243:561569.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 69

    Park EA, Goo JM, Lee JW et al. . Efficacy of computer-aided detection system and thin-slab maximum intensity projection technique in the detection of pulmonary nodules in patients with resected metastases. Invest Radiol 2009;44:105113.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 70

    Jankowski A, Martinelli T, Timsit JF et al. . Pulmonary nodule detection on MDCT images: evaluation of diagnostic performance using thin axial images, maximum intensity projections, and computer-assisted detection. Eur Radiol 2007;17:31483156.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 71

    Rubin GD, Lyo JK, Paik DS et al. . Pulmonary nodules on multi-detector row CT scans: performance comparison of radiologists and computer-aided detection. Radiology 2005;234:274283.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 72

    Fraioli F, Bertoletti L, Napoli A et al. . Computer-aided detection (CAD) in lung cancer screening at chest MDCT: ROC analysis of CAD versus radiologist performance. J Thorac Imaging 2007;22:241246.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 73

    Sahiner B, Chan HP, Hadjiiski LM et al. . Effect of CAD on radiologists’ detection of lung nodules on thoracic CT scans: analysis of an observer performance study by nodule size. Acad Radiol 2009;16:15181530.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 74

    Das M, Muhlenbruch G, Heinen S et al. . Performance evaluation of a computer-aided detection algorithm for solid pulmonary nodules in low-dose and standard-dose MDCT chest examinations and its influence on radiologists. Br J Radiol 2008;81:841847.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 75

    Lee HY, Goo JM, Lee HJ et al. . Usefulness of concurrent reading using thin-section and thick-section CT images in subcentimetre solitary pulmonary nodules. Clin Radiol 2009;64:127132.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 76

    Kubo T, Lin PJ, Stiller W et al. . Radiation dose reduction in chest CT: a review. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008;190:335343.

  • 77

    Lee JY, Chung MJ, Yi CA, Lee KS. Ultra-low-dose MDCT of the chest: influence on automated lung nodule detection. Korean J Radiol 2008;9:95101.

  • 78

    Funama Y, Awai K, Liu D et al. . Detection of nodules showing ground-glass opacity in the lungs at low-dose multidetector computed tomography: phantom and clinical study. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2009;33:4953.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 79

    Hein PA, Romano VC, Rogalla P et al. . Linear and volume measurements of pulmonary nodules at different CT dose levels— intrascan and interscan analysis. Rofo 2009;181:2431.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 80

    Singh S, Pinsky P, Fineberg NS et al. . Evaluation of reader variability in the interpretation of follow-up CT scans at lung cancer screening. Radiology 2011;259:263270.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 81

    Gierada DS, Pilgram TK, Ford M et al. . Lung cancer: interobserver agreement on interpretation of pulmonary findings at low-dose CT screening. Radiology 2008;246:265272.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 82

    Henschke CI, Boffetta P, Gorlova O et al. . Assessment of lung-cancer mortality reduction from CT screening. Lung Cancer 2011;71:328332.

  • 83

    van Klaveren RJ, Oudkerk M, Prokop M et al. . Management of lung nodules detected by volume CT scanning. N Engl J Med 2009;361:22212229.

  • 84

    Lopes Pegna A, Picozzi G, Mascalchi M et al. . Design, recruitment and baseline results of the ITALUNG trial for lung cancer screening with low-dose CT. Lung Cancer 2009;64:3440.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 85

    Pedersen JH, Ashraf H, Dirksen A et al. . The Danish randomized lung cancer CT screening trial—overall design and results of the prevalence round. J Thorac Oncol 2009;4:608614.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 86

    Menezes RJ, Roberts HC, Paul NS et al. . Lung cancer screening using low-dose computed tomography in at-risk individuals: the Toronto experience. Lung Cancer 2010;67:177183.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 87

    Veronesi G, Bellomi M, Scanagatta P et al. . Difficulties encountered managing nodules detected during a computed tomography lung cancer screening program. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008;136:611617.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 88

    Infante M, Cavuto S, Lutman FR et al. . A randomized study of lung cancer screening with spiral computed tomography: three-year results from the DANTE trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2009;180:445453.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 89

    Swensen SJ, Jett JR, Hartman TE et al. . Lung cancer screening with CT: Mayo Clinic experience. Radiology 2003;226:756761.

  • 90

    Henschke CI, Yankelevitz DF, Naidich DP et al. . CT screening for lung cancer: suspiciousness of nodules according to size on baseline scans. Radiology 2004;231:164168.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 91

    Henschke CI, Yankelevitz DF, Miettinen OS. Computed tomographic screening for lung cancer: the relationship of disease stage to tumor size. Arch Intern Med 2006;166:321325.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 92

    Steele JD, Buell P. Asymptomatic solitary pulmonary nodules. Host survival, tumor size, and growth rate. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1973;65:140151.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 93

    Galante E, Reduzzi D, Gallus G et al. . The growth rate in the interpretation of the natural history of lung cancer. Tumori 1984;70:427432.

  • 94

    Usuda K, Saito Y, Sagawa M et al. . Tumor doubling time and prognostic assessment of patients with primary lung cancer. Cancer 1994;74:22392244.

  • 95

    Arai T, Kuroishi T, Saito Y et al. . Tumor doubling time and prognosis in lung cancer patients: evaluation from chest films and clinical follow-up study. Japanese Lung Cancer Screening Research Group. Jpn J Clin Oncol 1994;24:199204.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 96

    Weiss W, Boucot KR, Cooper DA. The histopathology of bronchogenic carcinoma and its relation to growth rate, metastasis, and prognosis. Cancer 1970;26:965970.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 97

    Swensen SJ, Viggiano RW, Midthun DE et al. . Lung nodule enhancement at CT: multicenter study. Radiology 2000;214:7380.

  • 98

    Yi CA, Lee KS, Kim BT et al. . Tissue characterization of solitary pulmonary nodule: comparative study between helical dynamic CT and integrated PET/CT. J Nucl Med 2006;47:443450.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 99

    Christensen JA, Nathan MA, Mullan BP et al. . Characterization of the solitary pulmonary nodule: 18F-FDG PET versus nodule-enhancement CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006;187:13611367.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 100

    Schillaci O, Travascio L, Bolacchi F et al. . Accuracy of early and delayed FDG PET-CT and of contrast-enhanced CT in the evaluation of lung nodules: a preliminary study on 30 patients. Radiol Med 2009;114:890906.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 101

    Bastarrika G, Garcia-Velloso MJ, Lozano MD et al. . Early lung cancer detection using spiral computed tomography and positron emission tomography. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2005;171:13781383.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 102

    Ashraf H, Dirksen A, Loft A et al. . Combined use of positron emission tomography and volume doubling time in lung cancer screening with low-dose CT scanning. Thorax 2011;66:315319.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 103

    Ohno Y, Koyama H, Matsumoto K et al. . Differentiation of malignant and benign pulmonary nodules with quantitative first-pass 320-detector row perfusion CT versus FDG PET/CT. Radiology 2011;258:599609.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 104

    Liu X, Liang M, Wang Y et al. . The outcome differences of CT screening for lung cancer pre and post following an algorithm in Zhuhai, China. Lung Cancer 2011;73:230236.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 105

    CT screening for lung cancer: diagnoses resulting from the New York Early Lung Cancer Action Project. Radiology 2007;243:239249.

  • 106

    MacMahon H, Austin JHM, Gamsu G et al. . Guidelines for management of small pulmonary nodules detected on CT scans: a statement from the Fleischner Society. Radiology 2005;237:395400.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 107

    Eisenberg RL, Bankier AA, Boiselle PM. Compliance with Fleischner Society guidelines for management of small lung nodules: a survey of 834 radiologists. Radiology 2010;255:218224.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 108

    Revel MP, Bissery A, Bienvenu M et al. . Are two-dimensional CT measurements of small noncalcified pulmonary nodules reliable? Radiology 2004;231:453458.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 109

    Hanaoka T, Sone S, Takayama F et al. . Presence of local pleural adhesion in CT screening-detected small nodule in the lung periphery suggests noncancerous, inflammatory nature of the lesion. Clin Imaging 2007;31:385389.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 110

    Ahn MI, Gleeson TG, Chan IH et al. . Perifissural nodules seen at CT screening for lung cancer. Radiology 2010;254:949956.

  • 111

    Xu DM, van der Zaag-Loonen HJ, Oudkerk M et al. . Smooth or attached solid indeterminate nodules detected at baseline CT screening in the NELSON study: cancer risk during 1 year of follow-up. Radiology 2009;250:264272.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 112

    Bankier AA, Tack D. Dose reduction strategies for thoracic multidetector computed tomography: background, current issues, and recommendations. J Thorac Imaging 2010;25:278288.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 113

    Lee TY, Chhem RK. Impact of new technologies on dose reduction in CT. Eur J Radiol 2010;76:2835.

  • 114

    Pontana F, Pagniez J, Flohr T et al. . Chest computed tomography using iterative reconstruction vs filtered back projection (Part 1): evaluation of image noise reduction in 32 patients. Eur Radiol 2011;21:627635.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 115

    Pontana F, Duhamel A, Pagniez J et al. . Chest computed tomography using iterative reconstruction vs filtered back projection (Part 2): image quality of low-dose CT examinations in 80 patients. Eur Radiol 2011;21:636643.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 116

    Rami-Porta R, Ball D, Crowley J et al. . The IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project: proposals for the revision of the T descriptors in the forthcoming (seventh) edition of the TNM classification for lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol 2007;2:593602.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 117

    Edge SB, Byrd DR, Compton CC. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, 7th ed. New York: Springer; 2010.

  • 118

    Flieder DB, Vazquez M, Carter D et al. . Pathologic findings of lung tumors diagnosed on baseline CT screening. Am J Surg Pathol 2006;30:606613.

  • 119

    Hall FM. Identification, biopsy, and treatment of poorly understood premalignant, in situ, and indolent low-grade cancers: are we becoming victims of our own success? Radiology 2010;254:655659.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 120

    Raz DJ, Zell JA, Ou SH et al. . Natural history of stage I non-small cell lung cancer: implications for early detection. Chest 2007;132:193199.

  • 121

    Bach PB, Jett JR, Pastorino U et al. . Computed tomography screening and lung cancer outcomes. JAMA 2007;297:953961.

  • 122

    Sox HC. Better evidence about screening for lung cancer. N Engl J Med 2011;365:455457.

  • 123

    Carter D, Vazquez M, Flieder DB et al. . Comparison of pathologic findings of baseline and annual repeat cancers diagnosed on CT screening. Lung Cancer 2007;56:193199.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 124

    Foy M, Yip R, Chen X et al. . Modeling the mortality reduction due to computed tomography screening for lung cancer. Cancer 2011;117:27032708.

  • 125

    Tabar L, Vitak B, Chen TH et al. . Swedish two-county trial: impact of mammographic screening on breast cancer mortality during 3 decades. Radiology 2011;260:658663.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 126

    Molina JR, Yang P, Cassivi SD et al. . Non-small cell lung cancer: epidemiology, risk factors, treatment, and survivorship. Mayo Clin Proc 2008;83:584594.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 127

    Spira A, Ettinger DS. Multidisciplinary management of lung cancer. N Engl J Med 2004;350:379392.

  • 128

    Manser R, Wright G, Hart D et al. . Surgery for early stage non-small cell lung cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005:CD004699.

  • 129

    Albain KS, Swann RS, Rusch VW et al. . Radiotherapy plus chemotherapy with or without surgical resection for stage III non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase III randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2009;374:379386.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 130

    Crestanello JA, Allen MS, Jett JR et al. . Thoracic surgical operations in patients enrolled in a computed tomographic screening trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004;128:254259.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 131

    Grannis FW. Can we avert the need for pneumonectomy by screening for lung cancer? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2004;25:296.

  • 132

    Henschke CI, McCauley DI, Yankelevitz DF et al. . Early Lung Cancer Action Project: overall design and findings from baseline screening. Lancet 1999;354:99105.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 133

    Sone S, Nakayama T, Honda T et al. . Long-term follow-up study of a population-based 1996-1998 mass screening programme for lung cancer using mobile low-dose spiral computed tomography. Lung Cancer 2007;58:329341.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 134

    Townsend CO, Clark MM, Jett JR et al. . Relation between smoking cessation and receiving results from three annual spiral chest computed tomography scans for lung carcinoma screening. Cancer 2005;103:21542162.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 135

    Ashraf H, Tonnesen P, Holst Pedersen J et al. . Effect of CT screening on smoking habits at 1-year follow-up in the Danish Lung Cancer Screening Trial (DLCST). Thorax 2009;64:388392.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 136

    Taylor KL, Cox LS, Zincke N et al. . Lung cancer screening as a teachable moment for smoking cessation. Lung Cancer 2007;56:125134.

  • 137

    van den Bergh KA, Essink-Bot ML, Borsboom GJ et al. . Short-term health-related quality of life consequences in a lung cancer CT screening trial (NELSON). Br J Cancer 2010;102:2734.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 138

    van den Bergh KA, Essink-Bot ML, Borsboom GJ et al. . Long-term effects of lung cancer computed tomography screening on health-related quality of life: the NELSON trial. Eur Respir J 2011;38:154161.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 139

    Bunge EM, van den Bergh KA, Essink-Bot ML et al. . High affective risk perception is associated with more lung cancer-specific distress in CT screening for lung cancer. Lung Cancer 2008;62:385390.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 140

    Castleberry AW, Smith D, Anderson C et al. . Cost of a 5-year lung cancer survivor: symptomatic tumour identification vs proactive computed tomography screening. Br J Cancer 2009;101:882896.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 141

    Croswell JM, Baker SG, Marcus PM et al. . Cumulative incidence of false-positive test results in lung cancer screening: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 2010;152:505512.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 142

    Lafata JE, Simpkins J, Lamerato L et al. . The economic impact of false-positive cancer screens. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2004;13:21262132.

  • 143

    Wisnivesky JP, Mushlin AI, Sicherman N, Henschke C. The cost-effectiveness of low-dose CT screening for lung cancer: preliminary results of baseline screening. Chest 2003;124:614621.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 144

    Chirikos TN, Hazelton T, Tockman M, Clark R. Screening for lung cancer with CT: a preliminary cost-effectiveness analysis. Chest 2002;121:15071514.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 145

    Diederich S, Wormanns D, Semik M et al. . Screening for early lung cancer with low-dose spiral CT: prevalence in 817 asymptomatic smokers. Radiology 2002;222:773781.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 146

    Gohagan JK, Marcus PM, Fagerstrom RM et al. . Final results of the Lung Screening Study, a randomized feasibility study of spiral CT versus chest X-ray screening for lung cancer. Lung Cancer 2005;47:915.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 147

    Kaneko M, Eguchi K, Ohmatsu H et al. . Peripheral lung cancer: screening and detection with low-dose spiral CT versus radiography. Radiology 1996;201:798802.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 148

    Swensen SJ, Jett JR, Hartman TE et al. . CT screening for lung cancer: five-year prospective experience. Radiology 2005;235:259265.

  • 149

    Wiener RS, Schwartz LM, Woloshin S, Welch HG. Population-based risk for complications after transthoracic needle lung biopsy of a pulmonary nodule: an analysis of discharge records. Ann Intern Med 2011;155:137144.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 150

    Henschke CI, Yip R, Yankelevitz DF, Miettinen OS. Computed tomography screening for lung cancer: prospects of surviving competing causes of death. Clin Lung Cancer 2006;7:323325.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 151

    Bach PB, Cramer LD, Schrag D et al. . The influence of hospital volume on survival after resection for lung cancer. N Engl J Med 2001;345:181188.

  • 152

    Silvestri GA, Handy J, Lackland D et al. . Specialists achieve better outcomes than generalists for lung cancer surgery. Chest 1998;114:675680.

  • 153

    Stephan F, Boucheseiche S, Hollande J et al. . Pulmonary complications following lung resection: a comprehensive analysis of incidence and possible risk factors. Chest 2000;118:12631270.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 154

    Sone S, Takashima S, Li F et al. . Mass screening for lung cancer with mobile spiral computed tomography scanner. Lancet 1998;351:12421245.

  • 155

    Li F, Sone S, Abe H et al. . Lung cancers missed at low-dose helical CT screening in a general population: comparison of clinical, histopathologic, and imaging findings. Radiology 2002;225:673683.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 156

    Armato SG, Li F, Giger ML et al. . Lung cancer: performance of automated lung nodule detection applied to cancers missed in a CT screening program. Radiology 2002;225:685692.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 157

    DeVita VT Jr, Young RC, Canellos GP. Combination versus single agent chemotherapy: a review of the basis for selection of drug treatment of cancer. Cancer 1975;35:98110.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 158

    Folkman J. Seminars in Medicine of the Beth Israel Hospital, Boston. Clinical applications of research on angiogenesis. N Engl J Med 1995;333:17571763.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 159

    Swartz MA, Kristensen CA, Melder RJ et al. . Cells shed from tumours show reduced clonogenicity, resistance to apoptosis, and in vivo tumorigenicity. Br J Cancer 1999;81:756759.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 160

    Patz EF, Black WC, Goodman PC. CT screening for lung cancer: not ready for routine practice. Radiology 2001;221:587591.

  • 161

    Yoshizawa A, Motoi N, Riely GJ et al. . Impact of proposed IASLC/ATS/ERS classification of lung adenocarcinoma: prognostic subgroups and implications for further revision of staging based on analysis of 514 stage I cases. Mod Pathol 2011;24:653664.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 162

    Russell PA, Wainer Z, Wright GM et al. . Does lung adenocarcinoma subtype predict patient survival?: a clinicopathologic study based on the new international association for the study of lung cancer/american thoracic society/european respiratory society international multidisciplinary lung adenocarcinoma classification. J Thorac Oncol 2011;6:14961504.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 163

    Jett JR, Midthun DE. Commentary: CT screening for lung cancer—caveat emptor. Oncologist 2008;13:439444.

  • 164

    van den Bergh KA, Essink-Bot ML, Bunge EM et al. . Impact of computed tomography screening for lung cancer on participants in a randomized controlled trial (NELSON trial). Cancer 2008;113:396404.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 165

    Croswell JM, Kramer BS, Kreimer AR et al. . Cumulative incidence of false-positive results in repeated, multimodal cancer screening. Ann Fam Med 2009;7:212222.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 166

    Sistrom CL, Dreyer KJ, Dang PP et al. . Recommendations for additional imaging in radiology reports: multifactorial analysis of 5.9 million examinations. Radiology 2009;253:453461.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 167

    Berland LL, Silverman SG, Gore RM et al. . Managing incidental findings on abdominal CT: white paper of the ACR incidental findings committee. J Am Coll Radiol 2010;7:754773.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 168

    Larke FJ, Kruger RL, Cagnon CH et al. . Estimated radiation dose associated with low-dose chest CT of average-size participants in the National Lung Screening Trial. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011;197:11651169.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 169

    Brenner DJ. Radiation risks potentially associated with low-dose CT screening of adult smokers for lung cancer. Radiology 2004;231:440445.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 170

    Mascalchi M, Belli G, Zappa M et al. . Risk-benefit analysis of X-ray exposure associated with lung cancer screening in the Italung-CT trial. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006;187:421429.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 171

    Mahadevia PJ, Fleisher LA, Frick KD et al. . Lung cancer screening with helical computed tomography in older adult smokers: a decision and cost-effectiveness analysis. JAMA 2003;289:313322.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 172

    Marshall D, Simpson KN, Earle CC, Chu C. Potential cost-effectiveness of one-time screening for lung cancer (LC) in a high risk cohort. Lung Cancer 2001;32:227236.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 2724 1115 77
PDF Downloads 509 340 64
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0