• 1

    U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The Health Consequences of Smoking: A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health; 2004.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2

    ThunMJHenleySJBurnsD. Lung cancer death rates in lifelong nonsmokers. J Natl Cancer Inst2006;98:691699.

  • 3

    JemalABrayFCenterMM. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin2011;61:6990.

  • 4

    SiegelRWardEBrawleyOJemalA. Cancer statistics, 2011: the impact of eliminating socioeconomic and racial disparities on premature cancer deaths. CA Cancer J Clin2011;61:212236.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5

    GoldstrawPCrowleyJChanskyK. The IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project: proposals for the revision of the TNM stage groupings in the forthcoming (seventh) edition of the TNM classification of malignant tumours. J Thorac Oncol2007;2:706714.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6

    JemalAThunMJRiesLA. Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975–2005, featuring trends in lung cancer, tobacco use, and tobacco control. J Natl Cancer Inst2008;100:16721694.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7

    AberleDRBergCDBlackWC. The National Lung Screening Trial: overview and study design. Radiology2011;258:243253.

  • 8

    AberleDRAdamsAMBergCD. Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. N Engl J Med2011;365:395409.

  • 9

    LeeCIFormanHP. CT screening for lung cancer: implications on social responsibility. AJR Am J Roentgenol2007;188:297298.

  • 10

    WelchHGBlackWC. Overdiagnosis in cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst2010;102:605613.

  • 11

    HulkaBS. Cancer screening. Degrees of proof and practical application. Cancer1988;62:17761780.

  • 12

    HumphreyLLJohnsonMTeutschS. Lung cancer screening: an update for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK42872/. Accessed January 9 2012.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13

    ReichJM. A critical appraisal of overdiagnosis: estimates of its magnitude and implications for lung cancer screening. Thorax2008;63:377383.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14

    GodoyMCNaidichDP. Subsolid pulmonary nodules and the spectrum of peripheral adenocarcinomas of the lung: recommended interim guidelines for assessment and management. Radiology2009;253:606622.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15

    BlackWC. Computed tomography screening for lung cancer: review of screening principles and update on current status. Cancer2007;110:23702384.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16

    van IerselCAde KoningHJDraismaG. Risk-based selection from the general population in a screening trial: selection criteria, recruitment and power for the Dutch-Belgian randomised lung cancer multi-slice CT screening trial (NELSON). Int J Cancer2007;120:868874.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17

    Smoking-attributable mortality, years of potential life lost, and productivity losses—United States, 2000-2004. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep2008;57:12261228.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18

    PetoRDarbySDeoH. Smoking, smoking cessation, and lung cancer in the UK since 1950: combination of national statistics with two case-control studies. BMJ2000;321:323329.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19

    GarfinkelL. Time trends in lung cancer mortality among nonsmokers and a note on passive smoking. J Natl Cancer Inst1981;66:10611066.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20

    U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The Health Consequences of Involuntary Exposure to Tobacco Smoke: A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Departmsnt of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Coordinating Center for Health Promotion, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health; 2006.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21

    HackshawAKLawMRWaldNJ. The accumulated evidence on lung cancer and environmental tobacco smoke. BMJ1997;315:980988.

  • 22

    DriscollTNelsonDISteenlandK. The global burden of disease due to occupational carcinogens. Am J Ind Med2005;48:419431.

  • 23

    NelsonDIConcha-BarrientosMDriscollT. The global burden of selected occupational diseases and injury risks: methodology and summary. Am J Ind Med2005;48:400418.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24

    NurminenMKarjalainenA. Epidemiologic estimate of the proportion of fatalities related to occupational factors in Finland. Scand J Work Environ Health2001;27:161213.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25

    SteenlandKLoomisDShyCSimonsenN. Review of occupational lung carcinogens. Am J Ind Med1996;29:474490.

  • 26

    ReidAde KlerkNHAmbrosiniGL. The risk of lung cancer with increasing time since ceasing exposure to asbestos and quitting smoking. Occup Environ Med2006;63:509512.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27

    El GhissassiFBaanRStraifK. A review of human carcinogens—part D: radiation. Lancet Oncol2009;10:751752.

  • 28

    LeuraudKSchnelzerMTomasekL. Radon, smoking and lung cancer risk: results of a joint analysis of three European case-control studies among uranium miners. Radiat Res2011;176:375387.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 29

    LubinJHBoiceJDJr. Lung cancer risk from residential radon: meta-analysis of eight epidemiologic studies. J Natl Cancer Inst1997;89:4957.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30

    DarbySHillDAuvinenA. Radon in homes and risk of lung cancer: collaborative analysis of individual data from 13 European case-control studies. BMJ2005;330:223.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 31

    TuckerMAMurrayNShawEG. Second primary cancers related to smoking and treatment of small-cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer Working Cadre. J Natl Cancer Inst1997;89:17821788.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 32

    TravisLBGospodarowiczMCurtisRE. Lung cancer following chemotherapy and radiotherapy for Hodgkin’s disease. J Natl Cancer Inst2002;94:182192.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 33

    JonesASMorarPPhillipsDE. Second primary tumors in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer1995;75:13431353.

  • 34

    AtabekUMohit-TabatabaiMARainaS. Lung cancer in patients with head and neck cancer. Incidence and long-term survival. Am J Surg1987;154:434438.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 35

    RichardsonGETuckerMAVenzonDJ. Smoking cessation after successful treatment of small-cell lung cancer is associated with fewer smoking-related second primary cancers. Ann Intern Med1993;119:383390.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 36

    JonssonSThorsteinsdottirUGudbjartssonDF. Familial risk of lung carcinoma in the Icelandic population. JAMA2004;292:29772983.

  • 37

    LiXHemminkiK. Familial multiple primary lung cancers: a population-based analysis from Sweden. Lung Cancer2005;47:301307.

  • 38

    MatakidouAEisenTHoulstonRS. Systematic review of the relationship between family history and lung cancer risk. Br J Cancer2005;93:825833.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 39

    Bailey-WilsonJEAmosCIPinneySM. A major lung cancer susceptibility locus maps to chromosome 6q23-25. Am J Hum Genet2004;75:460474.

  • 40

    ThorgeirssonTEGellerFSulemP. A variant associated with nicotine dependence, lung cancer and peripheral arterial disease. Nature2008;452:638642.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 41

    HungRJMcKayJDGaborieauV. A susceptibility locus for lung cancer maps to nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subunit genes on 15q25. Nature2008;452:633637.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 42

    AmosCIWuXBroderickP. Genome-wide association scan of tag SNPs identifies a susceptibility locus for lung cancer at 15q25.1. Nat Genet2008;40:616622.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 43

    LambrechtsDBuysschaertIZanenP. The 15q24/25 susceptibility variant for lung cancer and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is associated with emphysema. Am J Respir Crit Care Med2010;181:486493.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 44

    HwangSJChengLSLozanoG. Lung cancer risk in germline p53 mutation carriers: association between an inherited cancer predisposition, cigarette smoking, and cancer risk. Hum Genet2003;113:238243.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 45

    SandersBMJayMDraperGJRobertsEM. Non-ocular cancer in relatives of retinoblastoma patients. Br J Cancer1989;60:358365.

  • 46

    FletcherOEastonDAndersonK. Lifetime risks of common cancers among retinoblastoma survivors. J Natl Cancer Inst2004;96:357363.

  • 47

    MayneSTBuenconsejoJJanerichDT. Previous lung disease and risk of lung cancer among men and women nonsmokers. Am J Epidemiol1999;149:1320.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 48

    SametJMHumbleCGPathakDR. Personal and family history of respiratory disease and lung cancer risk. Am Rev Respir Dis1986;134:466470.

  • 49

    AlavanjaMCBrownsonRCBoiceJDJrHockE. Preexisting lung disease and lung cancer among nonsmoking women. Am J Epidemiol1992;136:623632.

  • 50

    Wu-WilliamsAHDaiXDBlotW. Lung cancer among women in north-east China. Br J Cancer1990;62:982987.

  • 51

    GaoYTBlotWJZhengW. Lung cancer among Chinese women. Int J Cancer1987;40:604609.

  • 52

    BrennerAVWangZKleinermanRA. Previous pulmonary diseases and risk of lung cancer in Gansu Province, China. Int J Epidemiol2001;30:118124.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 53

    SkillrudDMOffordKPMillerRD. Higher risk of lung cancer in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. A prospective, matched, controlled study. Ann Intern Med1986;105:503507.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 54

    YangPSunZKrowkaMJ. Alpha1-antitrypsin deficiency carriers, tobacco smoke, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and lung cancer risk. Arch Intern Med2008;168:10971103.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 55

    KoshiolJRotunnoMConsonniD. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and altered risk of lung cancer in a population-based case-control study. PLoS One2009;4:e7380.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 56

    TurnerMCChenYKrewskiD. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is associated with lung cancer mortality in a prospective study of never smokers. Am J Respir Crit Care Med2007;176:285290.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 57

    Turner-WarwickMLebowitzMBurrowsBJohnsonA. Cryptogenic fibrosing alveolitis and lung cancer. Thorax1980;35:496499.

  • 58

    HubbardRVennALewisSBrittonJ. Lung cancer and cryptogenic fibrosing alveolitis. A population-based cohort study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med2000;161:58.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 59

    HughesJMWeillH. Asbestosis as a precursor of asbestos related lung cancer: results of a prospective mortality study. Br J Ind Med1991;48:229233.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 60

    ChlebowskiRTSchwartzAGWakeleeH. Oestrogen plus progestin and lung cancer in postmenopausal women (Women’s Health Initiative trial): a post-hoc analysis of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet2009;374:12431251.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 61

    HenschkeCIYankelevitzDFLibbyDM. Survival of patients with stage I lung cancer detected on CT screening. N Engl J Med2006;355:17631771.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 62

    LiFSoneSAbeH. Malignant versus benign nodules at CT screening for lung cancer: comparison of thin-section CT findings. Radiology2004;233:793798.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 63

    KimHYShimYMLeeKS. Persistent pulmonary nodular ground-glass opacity at thin-section CT: histopathologic comparisons. Radiology2007;245:267275.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 64

    TravisWDBrambillaENoguchiM. International association for the study of lung cancer/american thoracic society/european respiratory society international multidisciplinary classification of lung adenocarcinoma. J Thorac Oncol2011;6:244285.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 65

    FischbachFKnollmannFGriesshaberV. Detection of pulmonary nodules by multislice computed tomography: improved detection rate with reduced slice thickness. Eur Radiol2003;13:23782383.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 66

    ValenciaRDeneckeTLehmkuhlL. Value of axial and coronal maximum intensity projection (MIP) images in the detection of pulmonary nodules by multislice spiral CT: comparison with axial 1-mm and 5-mm slices. Eur Radiol2006;16:325332.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 67

    KawelNSeifertBLuetolfMBoehmT. Effect of slab thickness on the CT detection of pulmonary nodules: use of sliding thin-slab maximum intensity projection and volume rendering. AJR Am J Roentgenol2009;192:13241329.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 68

    PeloschekPSailerJWeberM. Pulmonary nodules: sensitivity of maximum intensity projection versus that of volume rendering of 3D multidetector CT data. Radiology2007;243:561569.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 69

    ParkEAGooJMLeeJW. Efficacy of computer-aided detection system and thin-slab maximum intensity projection technique in the detection of pulmonary nodules in patients with resected metastases. Invest Radiol2009;44:105113.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 70

    JankowskiAMartinelliTTimsitJF. Pulmonary nodule detection on MDCT images: evaluation of diagnostic performance using thin axial images, maximum intensity projections, and computer-assisted detection. Eur Radiol2007;17:31483156.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 71

    RubinGDLyoJKPaikDS. Pulmonary nodules on multi-detector row CT scans: performance comparison of radiologists and computer-aided detection. Radiology2005;234:274283.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 72

    FraioliFBertolettiLNapoliA. Computer-aided detection (CAD) in lung cancer screening at chest MDCT: ROC analysis of CAD versus radiologist performance. J Thorac Imaging2007;22:241246.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 73

    SahinerBChanHPHadjiiskiLM. Effect of CAD on radiologists’ detection of lung nodules on thoracic CT scans: analysis of an observer performance study by nodule size. Acad Radiol2009;16:15181530.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 74

    DasMMuhlenbruchGHeinenS. Performance evaluation of a computer-aided detection algorithm for solid pulmonary nodules in low-dose and standard-dose MDCT chest examinations and its influence on radiologists. Br J Radiol2008;81:841847.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 75

    LeeHYGooJMLeeHJ. Usefulness of concurrent reading using thin-section and thick-section CT images in subcentimetre solitary pulmonary nodules. Clin Radiol2009;64:127132.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 76

    KuboTLinPJStillerW. Radiation dose reduction in chest CT: a review. AJR Am J Roentgenol2008;190:335343.

  • 77

    LeeJYChungMJYiCALeeKS. Ultra-low-dose MDCT of the chest: influence on automated lung nodule detection. Korean J Radiol2008;9:95101.

  • 78

    FunamaYAwaiKLiuD. Detection of nodules showing ground-glass opacity in the lungs at low-dose multidetector computed tomography: phantom and clinical study. J Comput Assist Tomogr2009;33:4953.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 79

    HeinPARomanoVCRogallaP. Linear and volume measurements of pulmonary nodules at different CT dose levels— intrascan and interscan analysis. Rofo2009;181:2431.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 80

    SinghSPinskyPFinebergNS. Evaluation of reader variability in the interpretation of follow-up CT scans at lung cancer screening. Radiology2011;259:263270.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 81

    GieradaDSPilgramTKFordM. Lung cancer: interobserver agreement on interpretation of pulmonary findings at low-dose CT screening. Radiology2008;246:265272.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 82

    HenschkeCIBoffettaPGorlovaO. Assessment of lung-cancer mortality reduction from CT screening. Lung Cancer2011;71:328332.

  • 83

    van KlaverenRJOudkerkMProkopM. Management of lung nodules detected by volume CT scanning. N Engl J Med2009;361:22212229.

  • 84

    Lopes PegnaAPicozziGMascalchiM. Design, recruitment and baseline results of the ITALUNG trial for lung cancer screening with low-dose CT. Lung Cancer2009;64:3440.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 85

    PedersenJHAshrafHDirksenA. The Danish randomized lung cancer CT screening trial—overall design and results of the prevalence round. J Thorac Oncol2009;4:608614.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 86

    MenezesRJRobertsHCPaulNS. Lung cancer screening using low-dose computed tomography in at-risk individuals: the Toronto experience. Lung Cancer2010;67:177183.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 87

    VeronesiGBellomiMScanagattaP. Difficulties encountered managing nodules detected during a computed tomography lung cancer screening program. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2008;136:611617.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 88

    InfanteMCavutoSLutmanFR. A randomized study of lung cancer screening with spiral computed tomography: three-year results from the DANTE trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med2009;180:445453.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 89

    SwensenSJJettJRHartmanTE. Lung cancer screening with CT: Mayo Clinic experience. Radiology2003;226:756761.

  • 90

    HenschkeCIYankelevitzDFNaidichDP. CT screening for lung cancer: suspiciousness of nodules according to size on baseline scans. Radiology2004;231:164168.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 91

    HenschkeCIYankelevitzDFMiettinenOS. Computed tomographic screening for lung cancer: the relationship of disease stage to tumor size. Arch Intern Med2006;166:321325.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 92

    SteeleJDBuellP. Asymptomatic solitary pulmonary nodules. Host survival, tumor size, and growth rate. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg1973;65:140151.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 93

    GalanteEReduzziDGallusG. The growth rate in the interpretation of the natural history of lung cancer. Tumori1984;70:427432.

  • 94

    UsudaKSaitoYSagawaM. Tumor doubling time and prognostic assessment of patients with primary lung cancer. Cancer1994;74:22392244.

  • 95

    AraiTKuroishiTSaitoY. Tumor doubling time and prognosis in lung cancer patients: evaluation from chest films and clinical follow-up study. Japanese Lung Cancer Screening Research Group. Jpn J Clin Oncol1994;24:199204.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 96

    WeissWBoucotKRCooperDA. The histopathology of bronchogenic carcinoma and its relation to growth rate, metastasis, and prognosis. Cancer1970;26:965970.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 97

    SwensenSJViggianoRWMidthunDE. Lung nodule enhancement at CT: multicenter study. Radiology2000;214:7380.

  • 98

    YiCALeeKSKimBT. Tissue characterization of solitary pulmonary nodule: comparative study between helical dynamic CT and integrated PET/CT. J Nucl Med2006;47:443450.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 99

    ChristensenJANathanMAMullanBP. Characterization of the solitary pulmonary nodule: 18F-FDG PET versus nodule-enhancement CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol2006;187:13611367.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 100

    SchillaciOTravascioLBolacchiF. Accuracy of early and delayed FDG PET-CT and of contrast-enhanced CT in the evaluation of lung nodules: a preliminary study on 30 patients. Radiol Med2009;114:890906.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 101

    BastarrikaGGarcia-VellosoMJLozanoMD. Early lung cancer detection using spiral computed tomography and positron emission tomography. Am J Respir Crit Care Med2005;171:13781383.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 102

    AshrafHDirksenALoftA. Combined use of positron emission tomography and volume doubling time in lung cancer screening with low-dose CT scanning. Thorax2011;66:315319.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 103

    OhnoYKoyamaHMatsumotoK. Differentiation of malignant and benign pulmonary nodules with quantitative first-pass 320-detector row perfusion CT versus FDG PET/CT. Radiology2011;258:599609.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 104

    LiuXLiangMWangY. The outcome differences of CT screening for lung cancer pre and post following an algorithm in Zhuhai, China. Lung Cancer2011;73:230236.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 105

    CT screening for lung cancer: diagnoses resulting from the New York Early Lung Cancer Action Project. Radiology2007;243:239249.

  • 106

    MacMahonHAustinJHMGamsuG. Guidelines for management of small pulmonary nodules detected on CT scans: a statement from the Fleischner Society. Radiology2005;237:395400.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 107

    EisenbergRLBankierAABoisellePM. Compliance with Fleischner Society guidelines for management of small lung nodules: a survey of 834 radiologists. Radiology2010;255:218224.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 108

    RevelMPBisseryABienvenuM. Are two-dimensional CT measurements of small noncalcified pulmonary nodules reliable?Radiology2004;231:453458.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 109

    HanaokaTSoneSTakayamaF. Presence of local pleural adhesion in CT screening-detected small nodule in the lung periphery suggests noncancerous, inflammatory nature of the lesion. Clin Imaging2007;31:385389.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 110

    AhnMIGleesonTGChanIH. Perifissural nodules seen at CT screening for lung cancer. Radiology2010;254:949956.

  • 111

    XuDMvan der Zaag-LoonenHJOudkerkM. Smooth or attached solid indeterminate nodules detected at baseline CT screening in the NELSON study: cancer risk during 1 year of follow-up. Radiology2009;250:264272.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 112

    BankierAATackD. Dose reduction strategies for thoracic multidetector computed tomography: background, current issues, and recommendations. J Thorac Imaging2010;25:278288.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 113

    LeeTYChhemRK. Impact of new technologies on dose reduction in CT. Eur J Radiol2010;76:2835.

  • 114

    PontanaFPagniezJFlohrT. Chest computed tomography using iterative reconstruction vs filtered back projection (Part 1): evaluation of image noise reduction in 32 patients. Eur Radiol2011;21:627635.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 115

    PontanaFDuhamelAPagniezJ. Chest computed tomography using iterative reconstruction vs filtered back projection (Part 2): image quality of low-dose CT examinations in 80 patients. Eur Radiol2011;21:636643.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 116

    Rami-PortaRBallDCrowleyJ. The IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project: proposals for the revision of the T descriptors in the forthcoming (seventh) edition of the TNM classification for lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol2007;2:593602.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 117

    EdgeSBByrdDRComptonCC. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual7th ed.New York: Springer; 2010.

  • 118

    FliederDBVazquezMCarterD. Pathologic findings of lung tumors diagnosed on baseline CT screening. Am J Surg Pathol2006;30:606613.

  • 119

    HallFM. Identification, biopsy, and treatment of poorly understood premalignant, in situ, and indolent low-grade cancers: are we becoming victims of our own success?Radiology2010;254:655659.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 120

    RazDJZellJAOuSH. Natural history of stage I non-small cell lung cancer: implications for early detection. Chest2007;132:193199.

  • 121

    BachPBJettJRPastorinoU. Computed tomography screening and lung cancer outcomes. JAMA2007;297:953961.

  • 122

    SoxHC. Better evidence about screening for lung cancer. N Engl J Med2011;365:455457.

  • 123

    CarterDVazquezMFliederDB. Comparison of pathologic findings of baseline and annual repeat cancers diagnosed on CT screening. Lung Cancer2007;56:193199.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 124

    FoyMYipRChenX. Modeling the mortality reduction due to computed tomography screening for lung cancer. Cancer2011;117:27032708.

  • 125

    TabarLVitakBChenTH. Swedish two-county trial: impact of mammographic screening on breast cancer mortality during 3 decades. Radiology2011;260:658663.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 126

    MolinaJRYangPCassiviSD. Non-small cell lung cancer: epidemiology, risk factors, treatment, and survivorship. Mayo Clin Proc2008;83:584594.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 127

    SpiraAEttingerDS. Multidisciplinary management of lung cancer. N Engl J Med2004;350:379392.

  • 128

    ManserRWrightGHartD. Surgery for early stage non-small cell lung cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev2005:CD004699.

  • 129

    AlbainKSSwannRSRuschVW. Radiotherapy plus chemotherapy with or without surgical resection for stage III non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase III randomised controlled trial. Lancet2009;374:379386.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 130

    CrestanelloJAAllenMSJettJR. Thoracic surgical operations in patients enrolled in a computed tomographic screening trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2004;128:254259.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 131

    GrannisFW. Can we avert the need for pneumonectomy by screening for lung cancer?Eur J Cardiothorac Surg2004;25:296.

  • 132

    HenschkeCIMcCauleyDIYankelevitzDF. Early Lung Cancer Action Project: overall design and findings from baseline screening. Lancet1999;354:99105.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 133

    SoneSNakayamaTHondaT. Long-term follow-up study of a population-based 1996-1998 mass screening programme for lung cancer using mobile low-dose spiral computed tomography. Lung Cancer2007;58:329341.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 134

    TownsendCOClarkMMJettJR. Relation between smoking cessation and receiving results from three annual spiral chest computed tomography scans for lung carcinoma screening. Cancer2005;103:21542162.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 135

    AshrafHTonnesenPHolst PedersenJ. Effect of CT screening on smoking habits at 1-year follow-up in the Danish Lung Cancer Screening Trial (DLCST). Thorax2009;64:388392.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 136

    TaylorKLCoxLSZinckeN. Lung cancer screening as a teachable moment for smoking cessation. Lung Cancer2007;56:125134.

  • 137

    van den BerghKAEssink-BotMLBorsboomGJ. Short-term health-related quality of life consequences in a lung cancer CT screening trial (NELSON). Br J Cancer2010;102:2734.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 138

    van den BerghKAEssink-BotMLBorsboomGJ. Long-term effects of lung cancer computed tomography screening on health-related quality of life: the NELSON trial. Eur Respir J2011;38:154161.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 139

    BungeEMvan den BerghKAEssink-BotML. High affective risk perception is associated with more lung cancer-specific distress in CT screening for lung cancer. Lung Cancer2008;62:385390.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 140

    CastleberryAWSmithDAndersonC. Cost of a 5-year lung cancer survivor: symptomatic tumour identification vs proactive computed tomography screening. Br J Cancer2009;101:882896.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 141

    CroswellJMBakerSGMarcusPM. Cumulative incidence of false-positive test results in lung cancer screening: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med2010;152:505512.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 142

    LafataJESimpkinsJLameratoL. The economic impact of false-positive cancer screens. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev2004;13:21262132.

  • 143

    WisniveskyJPMushlinAISichermanNHenschkeC. The cost-effectiveness of low-dose CT screening for lung cancer: preliminary results of baseline screening. Chest2003;124:614621.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 144

    ChirikosTNHazeltonTTockmanMClarkR. Screening for lung cancer with CT: a preliminary cost-effectiveness analysis. Chest2002;121:15071514.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 145

    DiederichSWormannsDSemikM. Screening for early lung cancer with low-dose spiral CT: prevalence in 817 asymptomatic smokers. Radiology2002;222:773781.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 146

    GohaganJKMarcusPMFagerstromRM. Final results of the Lung Screening Study, a randomized feasibility study of spiral CT versus chest X-ray screening for lung cancer. Lung Cancer2005;47:915.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 147

    KanekoMEguchiKOhmatsuH. Peripheral lung cancer: screening and detection with low-dose spiral CT versus radiography. Radiology1996;201:798802.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 148

    SwensenSJJettJRHartmanTE. CT screening for lung cancer: five-year prospective experience. Radiology2005;235:259265.

  • 149

    WienerRSSchwartzLMWoloshinSWelchHG. Population-based risk for complications after transthoracic needle lung biopsy of a pulmonary nodule: an analysis of discharge records. Ann Intern Med2011;155:137144.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 150

    HenschkeCIYipRYankelevitzDFMiettinenOS. Computed tomography screening for lung cancer: prospects of surviving competing causes of death. Clin Lung Cancer2006;7:323325.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 151

    BachPBCramerLDSchragD. The influence of hospital volume on survival after resection for lung cancer. N Engl J Med2001;345:181188.

  • 152

    SilvestriGAHandyJLacklandD. Specialists achieve better outcomes than generalists for lung cancer surgery. Chest1998;114:675680.

  • 153

    StephanFBoucheseicheSHollandeJ. Pulmonary complications following lung resection: a comprehensive analysis of incidence and possible risk factors. Chest2000;118:12631270.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 154

    SoneSTakashimaSLiF. Mass screening for lung cancer with mobile spiral computed tomography scanner. Lancet1998;351:12421245.

  • 155

    LiFSoneSAbeH. Lung cancers missed at low-dose helical CT screening in a general population: comparison of clinical, histopathologic, and imaging findings. Radiology2002;225:673683.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 156

    ArmatoSGLiFGigerML. Lung cancer: performance of automated lung nodule detection applied to cancers missed in a CT screening program. Radiology2002;225:685692.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 157

    DeVitaVTJrYoungRCCanellosGP. Combination versus single agent chemotherapy: a review of the basis for selection of drug treatment of cancer. Cancer1975;35:98110.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 158

    FolkmanJ. Seminars in Medicine of the Beth Israel Hospital, Boston. Clinical applications of research on angiogenesis. N Engl J Med1995;333:17571763.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 159

    SwartzMAKristensenCAMelderRJ. Cells shed from tumours show reduced clonogenicity, resistance to apoptosis, and in vivo tumorigenicity. Br J Cancer1999;81:756759.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 160

    PatzEFBlackWCGoodmanPC. CT screening for lung cancer: not ready for routine practice. Radiology2001;221:587591.

  • 161

    YoshizawaAMotoiNRielyGJ. Impact of proposed IASLC/ATS/ERS classification of lung adenocarcinoma: prognostic subgroups and implications for further revision of staging based on analysis of 514 stage I cases. Mod Pathol2011;24:653664.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 162

    RussellPAWainerZWrightGM. Does lung adenocarcinoma subtype predict patient survival?: a clinicopathologic study based on the new international association for the study of lung cancer/american thoracic society/european respiratory society international multidisciplinary lung adenocarcinoma classification. J Thorac Oncol2011;6:14961504.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 163

    JettJRMidthunDE. Commentary: CT screening for lung cancer—caveat emptor. Oncologist2008;13:439444.

  • 164

    van den BerghKAEssink-BotMLBungeEM. Impact of computed tomography screening for lung cancer on participants in a randomized controlled trial (NELSON trial). Cancer2008;113:396404.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 165

    CroswellJMKramerBSKreimerAR. Cumulative incidence of false-positive results in repeated, multimodal cancer screening. Ann Fam Med2009;7:212222.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 166

    SistromCLDreyerKJDangPP. Recommendations for additional imaging in radiology reports: multifactorial analysis of 5.9 million examinations. Radiology2009;253:453461.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 167

    BerlandLLSilvermanSGGoreRM. Managing incidental findings on abdominal CT: white paper of the ACR incidental findings committee. J Am Coll Radiol2010;7:754773.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 168

    LarkeFJKrugerRLCagnonCH. Estimated radiation dose associated with low-dose chest CT of average-size participants in the National Lung Screening Trial. AJR Am J Roentgenol2011;197:11651169.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 169

    BrennerDJ. Radiation risks potentially associated with low-dose CT screening of adult smokers for lung cancer. Radiology2004;231:440445.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 170

    MascalchiMBelliGZappaM. Risk-benefit analysis of X-ray exposure associated with lung cancer screening in the Italung-CT trial. AJR Am J Roentgenol2006;187:421429.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 171

    MahadeviaPJFleisherLAFrickKD. Lung cancer screening with helical computed tomography in older adult smokers: a decision and cost-effectiveness analysis. JAMA2003;289:313322.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 172

    MarshallDSimpsonKNEarleCCChuC. Potential cost-effectiveness of one-time screening for lung cancer (LC) in a high risk cohort. Lung Cancer2001;32:227236.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 580 484 52
PDF Downloads 81 80 7
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0